1. The QE Program
Since March 2015 , the European Central Bank (ECB) has retained its program of public debt purchases, commonly referred to as quantitative easing (QE).
In the most basic terms, this is equivalent to the central bank increasing the money supply. The goal is to boost the economy by adding liquidity to capital markets, keeping interest rates low.
The eurozone – comprising the 19 countries that use the currency – adopted this program late, seven years after the US and three after Japan. Austerity had been the norm up to that point, mostly at the behest of Germany, the biggest economy in the group.
The president of the ECB had, however, assured markets back in 2012 that the monetary authority was ready to defend the currency by buying bonds from debt-laden countries at a time when there were serious doubts about the survival of the euro. Although these purchases never materialized, markets reacted and the yields came down (see figure 1).
QE programs should, all else equal, depreciate the value of the currency – making exports more competitive – and push up inflation (e.g., making imports, like oil, more expensive).
What happens when every major central bank is doing the same may turn out to be, of course, a very different story.
In fact, in the last few weeks we have seen the euro gaining ground against the dollar, reaching levels unseen since early 2015 (see figure 2). The euro has risen by more than 12% against main trading currencies this year, while the dollar is at a 33-month low.
Clearly, a loose monetary policy has not been enough to weaken the euro with respect to other major currencies.
2. Recent announcements and our assessment
Mario Draghi, the president of the ECB, recently stated that the central bank will reconsider its QE program in October, postponing once again a decision as to when the program will come to an end. In addition, he said the program would be kept in place at least until December (when it officially expires).
This means it will probably continue into 2018, even if at a slower pace. Analysts expected an announcement in June, at the ECB Forum in Sintra (Portugal).
Likewise, no news came out of Jackson Hole last month, when central bankers held their yearly meeting. The head of the German central bank (Bundesbank), for example, has been very explicit about wanting the program to end, in light of the economic recovery seen so far.
The QE program of the ECB consists of EUR 60 billion per month in bond purchases, and at least EUR 2.3 trillion ($2.7 trillion) will be spent by its end.
However, now that the eurozone is as strong as it has been in the last decade, with confidence running high, unemployment receding (not everywhere though), and exports at good levels, many have been left wondering why the ECB still won’t let go of its stimulus program.
Additionally, interest rates are currently at zero. They have been since March 2016, and were almost zero for many months before. This means that, currently, the ECB does not have many tools to face another crisis.
Thus, by scaling back its QE program, the bank recovers a valuable instrument for future action. Most likely, the main factor driving the decision to continue the program is inflation, which is still below the target.
On top of this, GDP growth is not yet satisfying, making the ECB’s case for continued asset purchases stronger.
Paradoxically, Mr Draghi’s announcement, even if it only pertained to a future reassessment of the QE program with no further commitments, was enough to help the euro soar against the dollar.
Besides making imports cheaper – hence putting further downward pressure on inflation –, exports are threatened by such a strong euro, which in turn hurts GDP. Exports by eurozone countries outside the EU have not been growing, a phenomenon observed even before the euro’s recent surge.
The latter will specifically impact multinational companies (many included in the pan-European Stoxx Europe 600 Index) – and hence governments via lower tax revenues. In the end, regardless of what European monetary authorities may wish, it seems that the strong euro is justified for now.
If we look at the trade balance of the EU and the eurozone, we see a strong surplus (see figure 5).
Additionally, internal demand has gotten stronger and the political menace represented by populist movements has subsided. Abroad, the U.S. is not doing much to prop up the dollar, including the passage of reforms that would strengthen its economy – and, therefore, its currency.
The recent volatility around the euro/dollar exchange rate represents, as always, an investment opportunity across a broad set of assets. Innealta’s quantitative analysts are closely monitoring the key variables that determine exchange rate movements, as well as any news developments that may impact its value.
This article was written by Innealta Capital, a participant in the ETF Strategist Channel.
Important information
The information provided comes from independent sources believed reliable, but accuracy is not guaranteed and has not been independently verified. This presentation includes opinions of Innealta Capital (Innealta), a division of AFAM Capital, Inc., and the performance results of such recommendations are subject to risks and uncertainties. All opinions and views constitute our judgments as of the date of writing and are subject to change at any time without notice. This material is not intended as and should not be used to provide investment advice and is not an offer to sell a security, or a solicitation, or an offer, or a recommendation, to buy a security. Investors should consult with an investment advisor to determine appropriate investment vehicles. Investment decisions should be made based on the investor’s specific financial needs and objectives, goals, time horizon and risk tolerance. Any investment is subject to risk. Exchange traded funds (ETFs) are subject to risks similar to those of stocks, such as market risk. The value of an investment and the return on invested capital will fluctuate over time and, when sold or redeemed, may be worth less than its original cost. Country/Regional risk is the chance that world events such as political upheaval or natural disaster will adversely affect the value of securities issued by companies in foreign countries or regions. Country/Regional risk is especially high in emerging markets. Emerging markets risk is defined as the chance that stocks of companies located in emerging markets will be substantially more volatile, and substantially less liquid, than the stocks of companies located in more economically developed foreign markets It is not possible to invest directly in an index. AFAM Capital, Inc. is a registered investment adviser. Al Frank Asset Management and Innealta Capital are divisions of AFAM Capital. AFAM is the investment advisor to individually managed client accounts and certain mutual funds. For more information, please visit afamcapital.com. Registration as an investment advisor does not imply any certain level of skill or training. Innealta is an asset manager specializing in the active management of portfolios of ETFs. Contact your financial advisor for additional information. 300-AFAM-10/2/2017