By Rob Glownia, RiverFront Investment Group
The Federal Reserve recently surprised the market with a very accommodative message. In summary, they communicated a willingness to hold off on future interest rate hikes and to exhibit patience regarding the size of their balance sheet. Since that communication, the S&P 500 has rallied about 3% and the yield on the 10-year UST dropped to 2.65% (yields fall when prices rise). To understand the pretty drastic change in tone, we should remind ourselves of the Federal Reserve’s primary objectives, which are to:
- Maximize employment
- Stabilize prices
- Moderate long-term interest rates
Often, the first two objectives are referred to the Fed’s “dual mandate”, which we’ll review below.
Maximize Employment
As you might have heard from our President, unemployment is near an all-time low. Equally impressive, is that unemployment has steadily dropped from about 10% in 2010 to below 4% today.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Not indicative of RiverFront performance. You cannot invest directly in an index.
Not only is unemployment low relative to US history, it’s also extremely low when compared to other developed nations. For example, unemployment is over 10% in Italy and it’s about 14% in Spain. By most measures, the Federal Reserve has achieved their full employment objective.
STABILIZED PRICES
Price stability has been a much more difficult objective for the Federal Reserve. Although there is not a quantitative definition of the Fed’s mandate of “price stability,” they have tried to target a steady increase in prices (inflation) of about 2%. Specifically, the Fed monitors core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE), which have been measured since 1959, and tracks the costs of various goods and services consumed by individuals. In that time, prices have risen about 3.25% a year, on average. In the 1970s and 80s, inflation measured nearly 10%, while most of the last decade core PCE has measured below 2%.
The Fed targets a modest level of inflation because the alternative (deflation) can lead to significant economic problems. When prices are declining, consumers typically stop spending because they expect prices to drop even more in the future. As demand drops and sales begin to slow, companies become less profitable. As companies become less profitable, wages drop, and lenders face more default risk on their loans. Often, economists use the term “deflationary spiral,” to describe the compounding negative effects of lower prices.
The inability for the Federal Reserve to create and sustain inflation through monetary policy has been concerning as well as surprising. However, the low inflation phenomenon for the past 10 years has also been prevalent in many other major economies, such as Europe and Japan. We believe that the Fed is up against a couple key headwinds for achieving higher prices:
1. Advances in Technology: Advances in technology have drastically reduced the cost of many things. For example, most of us now have photography capabilities in our pocket that would rival the greatest camera technology from 10 years ago, not to mention at a fraction of the cost. This is just a microcosm of the tech-driven price pressures that have contributed to the lack of inflation.
2. Increased Labor Productivity: Workers are accomplishing more with the assistance of robotics, online information, and Big Data. As a result, it takes fewer workers to oversee larger amounts of production using such technology. Therefore, the overall costs of production have decreased, and prices have followed.
3. Globalization: One of the reasons that the US imports so many goods and services is because consumers are attracted to lower prices. Countries that have cheaper labor (and cheaper currencies), can undercut prices for certain goods generated in the US. As such, prices have not been rising and inflation has been muted.
THE BOTTOM LINE
The Federal Reserve has met its employment objective but has struggled to maintain their 2% inflation target. As such, they’ve paused their interest rate hiking cycle until economic data warrants higher rates. To put some perspective on the magnitude of change in market expectations for future hikes, consider the chart below, which measures the probability of a Fed hike in 2019:
As shown above, investors were putting more than a 90% probability of a 2019 rate hike (blue line) as recent as last November. Today, investors only put about a 3% probability on the Fed raising rates again this year.
While we believe the Fed will continue to have difficulty achieving their 2% inflation target, we think it’s too soon to rule out a rate hike in 2019 and worry that investors are underestimating the likelihood of future rate increases. Ultimately, the Fed will want as many policy tools as possible to combat the next downturn. For this reason, it’s our opinion they’ll continue to look for opportunities to raise rates in advance of the next Recession. Therefore, if stocks continue to rally and financial conditions improve, we think the Fed will be especially anxious to hike rates again this year.
For these reasons, the fixed income portion of our asset allocation portfolios are positioned with the expectations that interest rates will be higher at the end of the year. We still prefer credit risk relative to interest rate risk and continue to own investment grade corporate bonds that exhibit both fixed and floating rate coupons.
Rob Glownia, CFA, CFP, is Senior Portfolio Manager at RiverFront Investment Group, a participant in the ETF Strategist Channel.
Important Disclosure Information
The comments above refer generally to financial markets and not RiverFront portfolios or any related performance. Past results are no guarantee of future results and no representation is made that a client will or is likely to achieve positive returns, avoid losses, or experience returns similar to those shown or experienced in the past.
Information or data shown or used in this material is for illustrative purposes only and was received from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy is not guaranteed.
In a rising interest rate environment, the value of fixed-income securities generally declines.
It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
Technical analysis is based on the study of historical price movements and past trend patterns. There are no assurances that movements or trends can or will be duplicated in the future.
Investing in foreign companies poses additional risks since political and economic events unique to a country or region may affect those markets and their issuers. In addition to such general international risks, the portfolio may also be exposed to currency fluctuation risks and emerging markets risks as described further below.
Changes in the value of foreign currencies compared to the U.S. dollar may affect (positively or negatively) the value of the portfolio’s investments. Such currency movements may occur separately from, and/or in response to, events that do not otherwise affect the value of the security in the issuer’s home country. Also, the value of the portfolio may be influenced by currency exchange control regulations. The currencies of emerging market countries may experience significant declines against the U.S. dollar, and devaluation may occur subsequent to investments in these currencies by the portfolio.
Foreign investments, especially investments in emerging markets, can be riskier and more volatile than investments in the U.S. and are considered speculative and subject to heightened risks in addition to the general risks of investing in non-U.S. securities. Also, inflation and rapid fluctuations in inflation rates have had, and may continue to have, negative effects on the economies and securities markets of certain emerging market countries.
Stocks represent partial ownership of a corporation. If the corporation does well, its value increases, and investors share in the appreciation. However, if it goes bankrupt, or performs poorly, investors can lose their entire initial investment (i.e., the stock price can go to zero). Bonds represent a loan made by an investor to a corporation or government. As such, the investor gets a guaranteed interest rate for a specific period of time and expects to get their original investment back at the end of that time period, along with the interest earned. Investment risk is repayment of the principal (amount invested). In the event of a bankruptcy or other corporate disruption, bonds are senior to stocks. Investors should be aware of these differences prior to investing.
Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 Index measures the performance of 500 large cap stocks, which together represent about 80% of the total US equities market.
RiverFront Investment Group, LLC, is an investment adviser registered with the Securities Exchange Commission under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The company manages a variety of portfolios utilizing stocks, bonds, and exchange-traded funds (ETFs). RiverFront also serves as sub-advisor to a series of mutual funds and ETFs. Opinions expressed are current as of the date shown and are subject to change. They are not intended as investment recommendations.
RiverFront is owned primarily by its employees through RiverFront Investment Holding Group, LLC, the holding company for RiverFront. Baird Financial Corporation (BFC) is a minority owner of RiverFront Investment Holding Group, LLC and therefore an indirect owner of RiverFront. BFC is the parent company of Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated (“Baird”), a registered broker/dealer and investment adviser.
Copyright ©2019 RiverFront Investment Group. All Rights Reserved. 741246