2018 vs 2008…. Many More Differences than Similarities

By Doug Sandler, Chris Konstantinos & Rod Smyth, RiverFront Investment Group

The lengthy bull market and the recent reappearance of market volatility has some investors worried that another 2008 is right around the corner. While longevity and volatility often precede bear markets, they rarely cause them. In our view, bear markets historically have been initiated by one or a combination of three conditions, none of which we believe are currently a sufficient threat.  The three conditions are 1) valuation excesses, 2) economic recession, and/or 3) tightening monetary policy.

Unlike 2008…Neither Stocks nor Home prices are at excessive valuation levels:
Bear markets can be triggered by excessive asset valuations that lead to the eventual bursting of bubbles ala the ‘Nifty Fifty’ stocks in 1970’s or the Dot-Com stocks in 2000. Today, like in 2008, US equity valuations are above their long-term trend, but generally not enough to trigger a bear market, according to RiverFront’s Price Matters methodology. In addition, Riverfront believes that stocks are attractively priced relative to bond yields. Historically speaking, stock multiples near current levels are supported, even should bond yields rise from current levels (for more on this, see last week’s Strategic View).

However, asset bubbles can occur anywhere and some of the most historic bubbles have occurred in non-equity asset classes, including commodities (1980), Japanese real estate (1990) or even tulips (1630). Heading into 2008, an obvious bubble existed in the housing market that does not exist today, as shown in the chart above. In our view, the bursting of a housing bubble can have a greater impact on society than the bursting of a stock market bubble because more individuals have exposure to housing than stocks.  Backing up that conclusion, the conference bureau reported that the latest census data (2011) suggested that nearly 70% of household wealth comes from housing.  

Unlike 2008…economic growth is accelerating, not slowing: 

The second condition that generally leads to a bear market is the threat of a recession.  The equity markets will often anticipate a recession by 6-12 months so investors need to be closely monitoring both macro (economic) and micro (corporate earnings) conditions for signs of a a slowdown.  Even before the housing bubble burst and caused the “great Recession”, there were signs of an economic and earnings slowdown in 2008 that do not exist today.  In fact, we believe there are more signs of a ‘second-leg’ of economic expansion in 2018; than a recession, as shown by both charts below.

Unlike 2008…the Fed does not appear to be ‘hitting the brakes’:
Tightening monetary policy often ushers in recessions because rising interest rates create attractive substitutes for stocks and there are fewer dollars ‘sloshing around’ to push equity prices higher.  Although the Fed is currently hiking rates, their intentions and today’s monetary conditions are markedly different today than they were in 2008.  Prior to 2008, the Fed was aggressively trying to fend off rising inflation, which was approaching 3%, and a housing bubble where home prices were appreciating at an annual rate of over 15%.  To that end, the Fed raised the target Fed Funds rate 17 times from 2004 to 2007, ending at a restrictive 5.25%.  Today, with inflation only registering ~2% and home prices appreciating at a more sustainable 5% pace, the Fed can be patient.  It is our view that the 5 rate hikes that have been implemented since 2015 have been meant to remove the excessive accommodation that was put in place following the Financial Crisis and not targeted to slow the economy.  Even factoring in 3 – 4 hikes this year, we are likely to end 2018 with rates still well below the mid – 2007 peak, in our view.

‘Shock’ Indicators Still Benign:  We recognize that a ‘shock’ which could cause a recession needs to be factored into our analysis above. A major trade war (which we assigned a 30% probability to in our 2018 Outlook) would indeed qualify as a shock. The stock markets’ recent decline on the back of the potential imposition of tariffs on steel and aluminum has alarmed investors who fear a trade war.  President Trump’s quip that “Trade Wars are easy to win” is either brinkmanship or economic naivety (or a bit of both). We believe it is mostly brinkmanship but the stakes are high. Trade wars have no long-term winners in our view. We believe, on balance, that neither this Administration nor our trading partners want an escalating trade war. We are not currently positioning portfolios for such a shock, in part because the typical ‘early warning indicators’ of a shock are not flashing.

From an ‘early warning’ perspective, we listen to the bond market, because bond investors tend to be more sensitive to ‘bad news’ than equity investors.  When bond investors worry about something, credit spreads tend to widen.  Today, unlike in 2008, credit spreads are not widening, but have actually tightened in 2018 (see left-hand chart below).  Second, the excessive financial leverage that has the tendency of turning a small shock into a crisis is not present, in our opinion.   Through the leverage lens, consumer leverage as a percentage of GDP has fallen from 97.7% in 2008 to 77.5% today (source: Ned Davis Research). In addition, banks have significantly more capital at their disposal to absorb potential losses (see right-hand chart below).

Bottom Line:  Despite the recent jump in volatility, we believe there are far more differences between 2018 and 2008 than there are similarities.  These differences are what give us confidence to believe that the bull market that began in 2009 will not end in 2018.  We welcome volatility since it is a condition that tends to strengthen the foundation of a bull market, similarly to how stress makes a tree grow stronger roots.

Doug Sandler, CFA, is Global Strategist; Chris Konstantinos, CFA, is Chief Investment Strategist; and Rod Smyth is Director of Investments at RiverFront Investment Group, a participant in the ETF Strategist Channel.

Important Disclosure Information:

The comments above refer generally to financial markets and not RiverFront portfolios or any related performance. Past results are no guarantee of future results and no representation is made that a client will or is likely to achieve positive returns, avoid losses, or experience returns similar to those shown or experienced in the past.

Information or data shown or used in this material is for illustrative purposes only and was received from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy is not guaranteed.

Disclosures continued on the following page.

RiverFront Investment Group, LLC, is an investment adviser registered with the Securities Exchange Commission under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The company manages a variety of portfolios utilizing stocks, bonds, and exchange-traded funds (ETFs). RiverFront also serves as sub-advisor to a series of mutual funds and ETFs. Opinions expressed are current as of the date shown and are subject to change. They are not intended as investment recommendations. 

RiverFront is owned primarily by its employees through RiverFront Investment Holding Group, LLC, the holding company for RiverFront. Baird Financial Corporation (BFC) is a minority owner of RiverFront Investment Holding Group, LLC and therefore an indirect owner of RiverFront. BFC is the parent company of Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated (“Baird”), a registered broker/dealer and investment adviser.

These materials include general information and have not been tailored for any specific recipient or recipients.  Accordingly, these materials are not intended to cause RiverFront Investment Group, LLC or an affiliate to become a fiduciary within the meaning of Section 3(21)(A)(ii) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended or Section 4975(e)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

Technical analysis is based on the study of historical price movements and past trend patterns.  There are no assurances that movements or trends can or will be duplicated in the future.

In a rising interest rate environment, the value of fixed-income securities generally declines.

High-yield securities (including junk bonds) are subject to greater risk of loss of principal and interest, including default risk, than higher-rated securities.

Important Disclosure Information Continued:

Stocks represent partial ownership of a corporation. If the corporation does well, its value increases, and investors share in the appreciation. However, if it goes bankrupt, or performs poorly, investors can lose their entire initial investment (i.e., the stock price can go to zero).  Bonds represent a loan made by an investor to a corporation or government.  As such, the investor gets a guaranteed interest rate for a specific period of time and expects to get their original investment back at the end of that time period, along with the interest earned. Investment risk is repayment of the principal (amount invested). In the event of a bankruptcy or other corporate disruption, bonds are senior to stocks.  Investors should be aware of these differences prior to investing.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) is the portion of a company’s profit allocated to each outstanding share of common stock. Earnings per share serves as an indicator of a company’s profitability.

The price-earnings ratio (P/E ratio) is the ratio for valuing a company that measures its current share price relative to its per-share earnings.

Index Definitions:

Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (S&P 500) measures the performance of 500 large cap stocks, which together represent about 75% of the total US equities market.

It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

Copyright ©2018 RiverFront Investment Group. All Rights Reserved. ID 440915, Expiration Date 03.05.19