Note: This article appears on the Strategist Channel

By Gary Stringer, Kim Escue and Chad Keller

At the beginning of this year, we were concerned about a potentially major error by the U.S. Federal Reserve (the Fed), and the implications of such an error on the global markets. Large U.S. equity market drawdowns are typically associated with an economic recession. We think that economic recessions in the U.S. are usually caused by the Fed overtightening monetary conditions and choking off economic growth.

Last fall and winter, the Fed was talking about raising interest rates, which we thought was problematic due to a combination of labor market slack and low market-based inflation expectations. We continue to see labor market slack and low inflation expectations, but the Fed has now backed away from its interest rate hike rhetoric, which we take as a positive sign.

We see labor market slack represented by a stubbornly wide gap between the headline unemployment rate (the U-3 rate), and the under-employment rate (the U-6) rate. Historically, the U-6 rate is approximately 1.8 times the U-3 rate. However, as the U-3 rate has fallen to pre-crisis levels, the U-6 rate has stalled. While the headline U-3 unemployment rate is down to 4.9%, the U-6 rate has recovered to 9.6%. Given the historical relationship between the unemployment and underemployment rates, we would expect the U-6 rate to be about 8.8%, or 0.8% lower, at this point.

Furthermore, market-based inflation expectations, as measured by 10-Year Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) breakeven spreads, continue to decline. As shown below, the market does not think that the Fed will come close to its 2% inflation target for years to come.


With both labor market slack and low inflation expectations persistent, the Fed has plenty of room to let short-term interest rates remain at their current levels. Combined with the additional uncertainties stemming from the Brexit vote, we expect both the Fed and the Bank of England to delay any potential interest rate hikes, while the European Central Bank and the Bank of Japan may ease policy further.

We do not think that the U.S. economy is in great shape, but it should continue to grow at a sluggish pace, so long as the Fed stays out of the way. Additionally, we expect nominal GDP, which we think is key to corporate revenue growth, to continue to grow near the low end of its post-financial crisis range.

Related: Analyzing How Global Markets are Grinding Higher

At a high level, nominal GDP is driven by growth in the labor force, plus productivity growth and inflation. We expect the U.S. labor force to advance about 0.5% per year, productivity growth to advance at about 1%, near the low end of its historical range, and inflation to be about 2%. That would equate to a nominal GDP of approximately 3.5%.

We think that 3.5% is a close approximation for S&P 500 Index revenue growth now that  the U.S. dollar and the price of oil, as well as other industrial commodities, have stabilized compared to their recent volatility. With these headwinds behind us, we expect to see the gap between NGDP and S&P 500 Index revenue to narrow as revenues increase.


Following revenue growth, we expect earnings growth to move into positive territory over the next few quarters, but to remain challenged by increasing wage pressure. As wage pressure grows, margins should continue to compress. With a dividend yield of approximately 2%, and little room for valuation expansion, this translates into a muted total return potential for U.S. equities in the near-term, in our opinion.

Related: Seeking Excess Returns While Managing Risk in Fixed Income

While we think that domestic equity returns may be challenged, we think that foreign equities offer interesting opportunities with an emphasis on earnings consistency and dividend yield. While domestic equities are generally priced near their historical valuation, based on price-to-book ratio, foreign developed and broad emerging markets continue to trade at a discount. As the global economy stabilizes, investors may seek better valuation opportunities overseas.


Importantly, we think that putting risk first is still the best course of action, and those that focus only on potential return and downplay risk will likely be punished in this environment. Managers like us, who have the ability and willingness to adjust risk profiles in anticipation of shifting market conditions, can play a major role in helping investor navigate these markets.

Gary Stringer is the CIO, Kim Escue is a Senior Portfolio Manager, and Chad Keller is the COO and CCO at Stringer Asset Management, a participant in the ETF Strategist Channel.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!