Muni Bonds in a New Interest Rate Regime | ETF Trends

The new calendar year will bring in a new administration, along with tax, tariff, and trade policy proposals that could impact investment opportunities across asset classes. Fixed income is especially top of mind as investors look to position portfolios in a new interest rate regime.

Sylvia Yeh, co-head of municipal fixed income at Goldman Sachs Asset Management, dives into the outlook for 2025, and shares some key considerations for fixed income investors, especially in the municipal bond market.

Question: We are all talking about a new interest rate regime. Let’s start there — what’s your outlook for rates in 2025?

Sylvia Yeh: We can’t really speak about 2025 without acknowledging what we experienced this year. That is, the interest rate narrative shifted significantly from a “hard” to a “soft” landing environment.

Inflation continues to normalize, albeit at a slower pace than anticipated. The labor market continues to show strength, and the US consumer is propelling the US economy.  This leads us to believe that yields may be “higher for longer.” In this “higher for longer “environment, we yields should be a little “stickier” because of stimulative fiscal policy and supportive economic growth steepening out yield curves.

We do also expect bouts of volatility intermittently throughout the year given U.S. policy uncertainty — specifically around Trade, Taxes, and Immigration.

Question: There’s renewed concern about inflation, given some of the proposed policies by the incoming administration. Has the outlook for fixed income as an asset class, specifically municipal bonds, changed post-election? Going into the election, we were talking about a great year for bonds in 2025. Is that still the case?

Yeh: The “Trump Trade” has certainly repriced most markets as policy impacts are assessed.  Fixed income investors, for example, may have been looking ahead to lower interest rates, especially since the Fed started cutting rates in September. But now, investors — and markets more broadly — have turned their focus back to inflationary pressures and a rising deficit. That’s because Trump is keen to impose tariffs and establish or maintain a lower tax rates for both individuals and corporations.

That concern initially forced a repricing in rates, but we have returned to yield levels before the Presidential election. This is a precursor to the volatility we continue to expect in 2025.

As it relates to munis, we will be closely monitoring to the rhetoric surrounding tax reform. The red sweep makes it now likely that the individual tax provisions in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act are extended to some degree. However, the likelihood of sweeping tax reform in 2025 is small, given the slim Republican majority in the House.

A key takeaway for fixed income investors is that yields remain elevated, so building out your core fixed income allocation is prudent. Active management, credit selection, and duration management can help optimize your bond portfolio and capitalize on opportunities created by policy uncertainty.

Question: From a macro perspective, what are the main drivers of results or points of concerns for municipal bond investors?

Yeh: The main drivers will be the direction of Treasury rates as the Fed continues to ease policy and navigate shifts in U.S. policy surrounding trade, taxes, and immigration.

General sentiment towards fixed income markets coupled with cross-market relative value will also drive muni flows as we kick off 2025. The record level of cash sitting on the sidelines in money market funds is worth keeping an eye on and should add support to municipal bond prices throughout the year.

From a valuation perspective. we’re entering the new year with narrow credit spreads and ratios slightly rich to fair value. Because of this, municipal investors will need to prudently manage risks in portfolios.

Even with the potential for bouts of volatility throughout the year, the opportunity set in munis, with elevated tax-equivalent yields alongside healthy credit fundamentals, should be supportive of positive flows into muni SMA/ETF/mutual funds.

Question: Are states in a good position to navigate a changing economic landscape, especially if any form of tax cuts materialize? NASBO projects slower growth next year, but suggests most states have enough reserves to keep projects going.

Yeh: Our outlook on municipal credit fundamentals remains cautiously positive. States have been meaningfully increasing reserves and rainy-day funds throughout this most recent period. And at current levels, average reserves provide a hefty offset to any future revenue declines should we see broader economic weakness.

Issuers have also de-levered, as debt service as a percentage of budgets has decreased. Positive equity performance will likely help pension funding ratios and add to income tax collections. And solid GDP growth (~2.5% range) should provide solid footing to keep sales tax growth firmly positive.

Question: How have muni bonds delivered value this year?

Yeh: We endured quite a rollercoaster ride this year, as the 10-yr U.S. Treasury rates opened the year at around 3.90% before selling off to around 4.70% in the late spring, before rallying back to around 3.60% in late summer and most recently retracing to 4.40%. Even amidst all this rate volatility, the Muni Agg has returned about 1.5% YTD.

Have munis delivered? We had two separate instances where the 10-yr U.S. Treasury sold off 70-plus bps and munis still managed to deliver positive returns. I think that would be an acceptable outcome for most return-minded fixed income investors. This speaks to the benefit of today’s higher yield environment and the need for active management as valuations shift in the muni market.

Depending on when investors deployed cash, the return profiles throughout this year could be vastly different. For instance, if investors deployed cash in municipals in May, it would be about +3%, approximately 150bps higher than putting money to work at the start of the year when valuations were extremely stretched given technical supply/demand balances.

Question: What can investors expect from munis in a new rate regime? Where are the key opportunities for 2025?

Yeh: We’re expecting to see increased investor interest in the asset class. Muni investors can expect durability from strong credit fundamentals and find attractive tax-equivalent yields.

We think investors will be drawn to the asset class because of higher yields and a need to extend duration as the yield curve steepens throughout the year due to continued Fed easing.

We’re also excited to see another year of increased issuance and the pockets of opportunities that may present. Whether it’s that issuers have gotten comfortable with the “higher for longer” theme, recent ballot approvals, growing infrastructure needs, and/or dwindling COVID-19 dollars, we expect issuers to continue to tap markets for capital spending projects and to further improve cash positions rather than spend down the reserves they have accumulated. The increased issuance creates opportunities for active investors to capitalize on and may also contribute to stickier muni yields in 2025.

For more news, information, and strategy, visit ETF Trends.


General Disclosures

Investments in fixed income securities are subject to the risks associated with debt securities generally, including credit, liquidity, interest rate, prepayment and extension risk. Bond prices fluctuate inversely to changes in interest rates. Therefore, a general rise in interest rates can result in the decline in the bond’s price.  The value of securities with variable and floating interest rates are generally less sensitive to interest rate changes than securities with fixed interest rates. Variable and floating rate securities may decline in value if interest rates do not move as expected. Conversely, variable and floating rate securities will not generally rise in value if market interest rates decline. Credit risk is the risk that an issuer will default on payments of interest and principal. Credit risk is higher when investing in high yield bonds, also known as junk bonds. Prepayment risk is the risk that the issuer of a security may pay off principal more quickly than originally anticipated. Extension risk is the risk that the issuer of a security may pay off principal more slowly than originally anticipated. All fixed income investments may be worth less than their original cost upon redemption or maturity.

Municipal securities are subject to credit/default risk and interest rate risk and may be more sensitive to adverse economic, business, political, environmental, or other developments if it invests a substantial portion of its assets in the bonds of similar projects or in particular types of municipal securities. While interest earned on municipal securities is generally not subject to federal tax, any interest earned on taxable municipal securities is fully taxable at the federal level and may be subject to tax at the state level.

Views and opinions expressed are for informational purposes only and do not constitute a recommendation by Goldman Sachs Asset Management to buy, sell, or hold any security. Views and opinions are current as of the date of this material and may be subject to change, they should not be construed as investment advice.

Economic and market forecasts presented herein reflect a series of assumptions and judgments as of the date of this presentation and are subject to change without notice. These forecasts do not take into account the specific investment objectives, restrictions, tax and financial situation or other needs of any specific client. Actual data will vary and may not be reflected here. These forecasts are subject to high levels of uncertainty that may affect actual performance. Accordingly, these forecasts should be viewed as merely representative of a broad range of possible outcomes. These forecasts are estimated, based on assumptions, and are subject to significant revision and may change materially as economic and market conditions change. Goldman Sachs has no obligation to provide updates or changes to these forecasts. Case studies and examples are for illustrative purposes only.

Goldman Sachs does not provide legal, tax or accounting advice, unless explicitly agreed between you and Goldman Sachs (generally through certain services offered only to clients of Private Wealth Management). Any statement contained in this presentation concerning U.S. tax matters is not intended or written to be used and cannot be used for the purpose of avoiding penalties imposed on the relevant taxpayer. Notwithstanding anything in this document to the contrary, and except as required to enable compliance with applicable securities law, you may disclose to any person the US federal and state income tax treatment and tax structure of the transaction and all materials of any kind (including tax opinions and other tax analyses) that are provided to you relating to such tax treatment and tax structure, without Goldman Sachs imposing any limitation of any kind. Investors should be aware that a determination of the tax consequences to them should take into account their specific circumstances and that the tax law is subject to change in the future or retroactively and investors are strongly urged to consult with their own tax advisor regarding any potential strategy, investment or transaction.

Confidentiality

No part of this material may, without Goldman Sachs Asset Management’s prior written consent, be (i) copied, photocopied or duplicated in any form, by any means, or (ii) distributed to any person that is not an employee, officer, director, or authorized agent of the recipient.

© 2024 Goldman Sachs. All rights reserved.

Compliance code – 404016-OTU-2171138