GLOBALT Spotlight: 10 Market Insights for February | ETF Trends

The Quick Summary: 

1) U.S. equity markets are near all-time highs. 

2) The Democratic party is in control of the legislative agenda with a narrow majority.

3) More fiscal stimulus is coming on top of large existing fiscal stimulus. 

4) Monetary stimulus may continue for some time after the pandemic is over.

5) Inflation risk should be watched carefully. 

6) Optimism about the pandemic ending soon is high, but there are still significant risks.

7) Recent S&P 500 earnings reports have been strong in aggregate. 

8) Market extremes may not be diminishing. Valuations remain high and speculation is rampant. 

9) The current environment embeds high exposure to both upside and downside.

10) GLOBALT’s positioning remains conservative. 

January markets started off as a continuation of the same trends as in 4Q20, but then…a  couple of things changed. One of them was not small cap outperforming large cap by a significant,  margin which did continue. Nor was it emerging markets, which also continued to outperform U.S.  large caps. What changed first was the yield on the ten-year U.S. Treasury, which had been trading.  The changes were ostensibly driven by thoughts of potentially resurgent inflation from vaccine  traction, anticipated re-openings, reaccelerating economic activity, resilient corporate earnings,  additional fiscal stimulus and continued monetary stimulus. The next thing to change, closer to the  end of the month, were stock prices that started to fall enough to garner some attention, and  growth started to outperform value again. 

A “Blue Wave” after all, but the amplitude is small. The election uncertainty is finally over, but  even though the Democratic party controls the Presidency and both sides of Congress, it is by a  slim margin. We have replaced “election uncertainty” with “legislative uncertainty.” The range of  likely legislative outcomes is narrow and more moderate than some constituencies might have  been able to accomplish had there been a mandate, one way or another. Even within that narrow range, the proposed policies encompass significant change and the policies passed will have a  meaningful impact. Aside from the fiscal package, there are taxes, foreign policy, trade, regulation (big tech, financial and environmental) and other economic policies, such as minimum wage,  various subsidies funded by additional debt and/or redistribution of income/wealth.  

And then there was more stimulus and more stimulus. Another $1.9 trillion is on the table and  the horse trading is in swing (there was a ≈$618 billion counter). This is expected to be followed  by an infrastructure package which has not been given a firm number yet, but seems to be  ruminating north of the counter-offer. Bipartisan seems to mostly mean, “Why don’t you just do  it my way,” but the needle may have moved somewhat in the loose direction of more cooperation.  The urgency of the effects of the pandemic on people’s lives may nudge that along.  Whatever finally passes, more money will be borrowed and the “pay me later” column will get  bigger. The markets, for now, are counting that as a positive underpinning on the side of taking  more risk. The bringing of the check is far in the future, there isn’t a lot of looking around for that  chair to sit in when the music stops.  

The Fed sends mixed messages. Not. Sure, there are 12 Federal Reserve Bank Presidents and  seven Board of Governors, and they all make public appearances to discuss what they are thinking.  In January, a few notably talked about “tapering,” with some comments suggesting that if the  economy was stronger earlier, then maybe tapering could start earlier. They also suggested that  rising inflation is OK (it is what they have been trying to achieve over the past few years) and that  rising rates are also OK as long as they don’t rise far enough to hurt the stock market, whatever  level that is. If there were any doubts as to the Fed’s intentions, that was cleared up in Chairman  Powell’s press conference later in the month when he said it is just too early to be talking about  dates on tapering. He also added the focus on a Fed exit is premature, emphasizing the need for  the Fed to remain accommodative even after the economy fully reopens to help those workers that  were displaced by the pandemic or technology get back into the work force. Lower for longer  means lower for longer. 

The Inflation watch is on. Inflation expectations have been on the rise from very low levels, but  are still well contained below 2.5% and are only back to where they were at the beginning of 2019.  Some actual prices have been rising as well, such as Asian container rates. Some of these prices  are driven by supply issues, some by demand, some by the pandemic itself and some by knock-on  issues. Labor costs have been influenced both up and down, but in aggregate have been subdued.  Core CPI remains well below 2%. The Fed, for its part, remains far more concerned about deflation  than inflation for the time being, and has said that even if inflation ticks up in the near term, it is  likely to be transitory. Inflation on the other side of the visible horizon may end up being a problem,  but getting from here to there may take a while.  

Optimism regarding the overcoming of the Coronavirus abounds. Mostly this seems to be the  result of the astounding quickness at which very high efficacy vaccines have been developed,  manufacturing has been ramped up, and distribution has been deployed. Add in that, despite a degree of skepticism, interest in getting vaccinated has been on the rise. It hasn’t been smooth,  and it hasn’t been fair to people all over the world, but it is moving in the right direction. 

There is more uncertainty about the future path of the disease under the surface, however. Here  are some things we don’t know that will affect this future path. How long is the vaccine effective,  what happens when it “wears off,” and how will a vaccinated person know? How effective are the  current vaccines against the new strains that are blooming, and the future new strains that may be  on the way? If a vaccinated person is exposed to COVID, is it in their body and can they infect  someone else who is not vaccinated? What will the level of understanding be by the average  person about what getting the vaccine means, and how will the behavior of vaccinated people  influence transmission? If some of these questions turn out to have an experience on the negative  side, the pandemic may persist longer than anticipated and the optimism may be dented.  

The virus still rages in the meantime. It has come off its recent peak in terms of cases,  hospitalizations and deaths, but the lockdowns or activity curtailments are still stretching out into  the future in many countries with some still contemplating further extensions. New strains are  indeed hitting the mutation jackpot, resulting in what looks to be more transmissible and deadlier  versions. The virus remains widespread and there are enough pulls available on the evolutionary  handle that future unpleasant developments may be possible. 

The recent economic and earnings news has been on the positive side. The economic news from  PMIs to employment, has been more like treading water, but that is better than it could have been  given with the December and January virus surges. The S&P 500 earnings news has been decidedly  better. A little less than halfway through the reporting season for 4Q20 earnings, the blended 4Q  S&P 500 earnings growth was slightly positive. Surprisingly, this compares to the -12.7% decline  expected at the start of 4Q and the -8.8% decline forecast just before the banks unofficially kicked  off earnings season in January. Just over 82% of companies reporting beat consensus forecasts,  well above the 75% one-year and 74% five-year averages. In aggregate, companies are reporting  earnings 16.3% above expectations, better than the 11.9% one-year average rate of positive  surprises and the five-year average of 6.3%. Perhaps more significantly, corporate commentary has  been more upbeat and 1Q21 estimates are moving higher. The big themes revolve around  WFH/LFH tailwinds, the accelerated e-commerce shift, stable credit, an accelerated digital  transformation, strong semi demand, residential construction, cost control, renewed capital, and  the continued coronavirus drag on epicenter industries.  

The Jeopardy answer is: The market extremes are not diminishing. The Jeopardy question is:  What does all this have to do with the markets? Put simply, inflation is low, interest rates are low,  stock market valuations are high, positioning is crowded, and speculation is rampant. There is a  connection between the first two and the last three. It can be captured by TINA—There Is No  Alternative. And by that, it is meant “…to investing in stocks.” Where else can you potentially get a “return?” This is not new. The last time the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield saw 4% was back in 2010. 

Is that so low that TINA comes into play? Federal Reserve Chair Powell has recently downplayed  the connection between low rates and asset values. You can count a significant number of market  pundits as skeptical.  

Valuations are high. If you use stock prices or some broader equivalent as the numerator and  choose-your-own-fundamental as the denominator, valuations will be high relative to most  historical norms. John Hussman likes to use a measure that is based on Market Cap/GVA & Margin  Adjusted P/E, to estimate where the historical norm is. This measure shows there is a lot of  distance (downward) between where we are now in terms of the S&P 500 Index and a longer-term  sustainable level, to which the market could trade sometime in the future. It almost always has; it  is just a matter of how long it takes. So far, we are beyond the longest timeframe from the past.  

Positioning is crowded. Cash levels are low and the performance of “growth” relative to “value” is  extreme even after its 4Q20 underperformance. How do you know when the line is crossed from  “crowded positioning” to “speculation?” We are being schooled in the here-and-now.  

Speculation is rampant. You could point to margin debt to GDP, which is at an all-time high. You  could point to bitcoin’s meteoric rise. You could point to “eco” stocks’ also meteoric rises. You  could point to surging options activity and IPO/SPAC/secondary trends. And of course, now you can  point to Reddit’s WallStreetBets and the attack on the “shorts” (GME, etc.). Speculation can and  does take place in “normal” markets and is part of a healthy financial market system. It is not bad  in and of itself. Rampant speculation has been a past sign of market tops, coupled with high  leverage, interdependent counterparties where the weak link is not apparent, aggressive risk sizing,  and a complete disconnect with underlying fundamentals, creates the potential for a “dislocation”,  which can act as a catalyst for a severe correction. 

What to do? The current environment embeds high exposure to both upside and downside. Of  course, no one wants to miss out on the former and no one wants to experience the latter. It is an  uncomfortable environment and could persist for quite some time. Our approach may be  summarized as protect but participate and be on high alert for signs when it is better to be one  (particularly the former), than the other.  

We continue to use a broad array of tools at our disposal to monitor the environment for possible  changes to the positioning of our strategies. Fundamentals at the macro and company/industry  level on a quantitative and qualitative basis. Technicals throughout the markets. We consider many  scenarios, their potential implications and make judgments based on the weight of the evidence. 

We continue to be conservative, emphasizing quality and diversification in this environment.  Taking measured, thoughtful, prudent steps, and maintain a positioning away from extremes is  what we believe is the best way to manage uncertainty. We recently reduced some risk by selling  our small cap value position and leaving the proceeds in cash. Our strategies are now positioned  with almost no exposure to credit, and lower, more style-neutral levels of equities. We retain significant exposure to gold. Our fixed income duration is neutral excluding cash, but we are now  more overweight cash. We expect to remain conservative and measured in our positioning and  look towards executing additional asymmetric risk/reward opportunities as they arise.  

Data Source: FactSet and References by StreetAccount via GLOBALT Investments. Data and Analytics provided by FactSet. Author: Tom Martin,  Senior Portfolio Manager – GLOBALT Investments. 

GLOBALT is an SEC Registered Investment Adviser since 1991 and, effective July 10, 2013, remains a Registered Investment Adviser through a separately  identifiable division of Synovus Trust N.A., a nationally chartered trust company. This information has been prepared for educational purposes only, as  general information and should not be considered a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. This does not constitute legal or professional  advice, and is not tailored to the investment needs of any specific investor. Registration of an investment adviser does not imply any certain level of skill or  training. Due to rapidly changing market conditions and the complexity of investment decisions, supplemental information may be required to make  informed investment decisions, based on your individual investment objectives and suitability specifications. Investors should seek tailored advice and  should understand that statements regarding future prospects of the financial market may not be realized, as past performance does not guarantee and/ or is not indicative of future results. Content may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in whole or in part by any means without written  permission from GLOBALT. Regarding permission, as well as to receive a copy of GLOBALT’s Form ADV Part 2 and Part 3, contact GLOBALT’s Chief  Compliance Officer, 3400 Overton Park Drive, Suite 500, Atlanta GA 30339. You can obtain more information about GLOBALT Investments and its advisers  by accessing the Investment Advisor Public Disclosure website.  

This content is developed from sources believed to be accurate information, and is provided by FactSet and StreetAccount, however, its accuracy cannot  be guaranteed by GLOBALT. It may not be used for the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalties. Please consult legal or tax professionals for specific  information regarding your individual situation. The opinions and some comments contained herein reflect the judgment of the author, as of the date  noted.  

Investment products and services provided are offered through Synovus Securities, Inc. (SSI), a registered Broker-Dealer, member FINRA/SIPC and SEC  Registered Investment Adviser, Synovus Trust Company, N.A. (STC), Creative Financial Group, a division of SSI. Trust services for Synovus are provided by  STC.  

Regarding the products and services provided by GLOBALT: