For much of the past two years, Bitcoin has behaved as a liquidity proxy — sensitive to Federal Reserve guidance and rate expectations. That relationship appears to be weakening. Geopolitical developments, particularly those affecting oil markets, are now playing a more dominant role in shaping price action. For portfolio constructors, this shift carries meaningful implications.
What changed
The trigger was escalating tensions involving Iran. Rather than selling off alongside risk assets — its historical pattern during geopolitical shocks — Bitcoin gained approximately 10% from the onset of the tensions, while equities declined and gold posted only modest gains. Two things explain this divergence.
First, market structure entering the event was unusually clean. Large-holder selling over the preceding five months had pushed prices through key technical and valuation thresholds. By the time geopolitical risk resurfaced, leverage in the system had normalised — from around 33% in October 2025 to roughly 25%. Valuation measures, including the MVRV ratio, indicated Bitcoin was trading below its realised value, a level historically associated with cyclical troughs rather than the onset of new downside.
Second, the narrative around Bitcoin as a non-sovereign asset — one that operates outside traditional financial systems and cannot be seized or sanctioned through conventional channels — has re-emerged with renewed force.
The macro backdrop
February’s US payrolls came in at approximately -90,000, well below the +60,000 consensus. In most environments, a miss of that magnitude would drive significant repricing of rate cut expectations. Instead, markets largely absorbed it. The probability of a Federal Reserve rate cut in June now sits at around 20%, the lowest level of this cycle. Pump prices have risen roughly 25% since tensions intensified, and upcoming CPI prints are likely to reflect renewed pressure — constraining the Fed’s room to ease even as growth slows.
This combination of decelerating growth and energy-driven inflation is structurally adverse for traditional risk assets. For Bitcoin, the same dynamics that limit central bank flexibility — sovereign debt burdens and the demonstrated use of financial infrastructure as a geopolitical tool — are precisely those that make its structural properties most relevant to portfolio allocators.
Institutional signal
Digital asset investment products recorded three consecutive weeks of net inflows following the onset of the Iran crisis, totalling approximately $1.4B. This followed five consecutive weeks of ETF outflows. The reversal, and its persistence into a period of acute geopolitical stress, suggests institutional investors are treating Bitcoin as a strategic allocation — behaviour more consistent with safe haven logic than speculative risk-taking.
Portfolio implications
The emerging evidence points to a potential shift in Bitcoin’s correlation structure. If its sensitivity to rate expectations continues to diminish while its role as a geopolitical hedge gains traction, the diversification case within multi-asset portfolios strengthens.
For more news, information, and strategy, visit the CoinShares Crypto ETF Hub.
