Recently, the emerging markets (EM) have been embattled in a storm of currency weakness and disappointing performance. However, that tide may be starting to turn. Case in point: the WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Index (WTEMHY) has returned 11.52% year-to-date, with currencies contributing 1% to that performance.1
In recent years, currency moves have dominated investor returns in the emerging market equity space. This was especially the case in 2014, where FX stripped over 15% off the broad-based high-yielding emerging market equity strategy defined by WTEMHY. More generally, the U.S. dollar has had a significant run-up against its trading partners in both the developed and the emerging market complex. For context, the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index, a liquidity-adjusted measure of the dollar against a broad set of developed and emerging currencies, appreciated 10.31% in 2014 and 13.58% over the most recent nine-month period.2
Are Emerging Market Currencies Offering Good Value?
A few emerging market countries screen as being potentially attractive candidates to add exposure to, particularly after the sharp decline in their currencies.
While foreign currencies were a large drag on WTEMHY’s performance in 2014, they subsequently added 100 basis points (bps) to their performance in 2015. This is in stark contrast to the developed world, proxied by the MSCI EAFE Index, where foreign currencies have detracted 295 basis points from returns in 2015 alone.3
With currencies becoming a performance tailwind in WTEMHY, value hunters may find depressed equity price multiples in EM more enticing.
FX Contribution Dominates Performance
• FX has been a drag: The chart above highlights the various periods under consideration and the jarring reality that FX has been a large driver of performance across the stated periods of three, five and seven years. In the event the higher dollar trend bucks, this could potentially sweeten the EM opportunity, given that the region is trading at 13x earnings (represented by P/E ratio) and at a 13.5% discount against its 10-year median.4
• Russian Ruble Staking Performance Differential 2014 vs. 2015: In 2014, currencies stripped 15.6% off performance, while WTEMHY returned -10.6%.5 Another way to think about this is that if it were not for currencies, returns would have been positive. A large portion of the FX drag was attributable to the Russian ruble, which depreciated over 43%. Specifically, the ruble contributed -10.1% of the -15.6% underperformance that was currency related. While the ruble was a large detractor in 2014, 2015 was characterized by the ruble adding most significantly to WTEMHY’s currency picture: it added 3% of the 1% total currency contribution in 2015.