Ouch. That’s gonna leave a mark

By my reading, the recent tone in the investment press and blogosphere has been decidedly, shall we say, anti-active.  Index-based investing has won, active has lost, time for stock pickers and portfolios managers to find new careers.  It’s over.

One of the sharper summations of the zeitgeist comes by way of a recent post from The Banker’s Umbrella.  The author takes a sardonic jab at the life of an equity fund manager:  track the index, naively over/under weight a few names, sit back and collect a performance-be-damned paycheck.  Yes, it’s harsh and perhaps the passive-aggressive (sorry, couldn’t help myself) tack warrants a flag for unnecessary roughness.  But underlying the jab are real trends supported by real research.

Perhaps the most succinct example of that research is William F. Sharpe’s “Arithmetic of Active Management,” which says the average active dollar, after costs, must underperform the average passive dollar.  The proof case for Sharpe’s work is S&P Dow Jones’ regularly-published SPIVA researchSPIVA demonstrates that the majority of active managers underperform their benchmarks, especially over longer time periods.  SPIVA’s companion piece, the Persistence Scorecard, shows that it’s nigh impossible for any manager to remain among the top performing segment over time.

Trends can shift and it is possible that the anti-active wave may one day swing back to a more favorable view of professional asset managers.  Regardless of prevailing sentiments, however, there remain sound reasons for the superiority of index investing.

This article was written by Jamie Farmer, managing director, index investment strategy & data services, S&P Dow Jones Indices.

© S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC 2013. Indexology® is a trademark of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC (SPDJI). S&P® is a trademark of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC and Dow Jones® is a trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC, and those marks have been licensed to SPDJI. This material is reproduced with the prior written consent of SPDJI. For more information on SPDJI, visit http://www.spdji.com