According to ETF Screen, the Relative Strength Factor (RSf) represents a percentile ranking of fund performance relative to all other funds in the universe. While it is measured over an entire year, the factor heavily weights recent performance to identify funds that have been accelerating versus those that have been deteriorating. The higher the percentile rank (0-99.99), the greater the relative strength.
One method to visualize meaningful changes over time is to see the data on a quarter-over-quarter basis. For example, iShares Biotechnology (IBB) registered a RSf rank of 98.9 at the beginning of February. At the start of May, though, the seemingly unstoppable biotech bellwether slipped to a modest 67.1. Conversely, Market Vectors Small Cap India (SCIF) had been woefully unappreciated back on 2/4/14 when it logged in at 23.4. Three months later, SCIF resides in the top decile (98.3) of the exchange-traded fund universe.
These individual stories may meet a criterion for “nice-to-know info.” However, when it comes to chin-rubbing fascination, one usually needs to see shifts in major asset classes.
|Are Sunnier Skies Ahead For These Asset Class ETFs?|
|RSf (2/4)||RSf (5/1)|
|GreenHaven Contin Commodity (GCC)||33||63.8|
|Vanguard REIT (VNQ)||30.5||55|
|SPDR S&P International Dividend (DWX)||27.1||77.3|
|iShares MSCI Pacific Ex-Japan (EPP)||18||52|
|Vanguard Emerging Markets (VWO)||12.7||36.1|
|Are Storm Clouds Hanging Over These Asset Class ETFs?|
|iShares Russell MicroCap (IWC)||93.9||43.2|
|Powershares NASDAQ 100 (QQQ)||91.2||76|
|Small Cap Via iShares Russell 2000 (IWM)||84.2||43.4|
|PowerShares DB Bullish U.S. Dollar (UUP)||35.6||11.5|
|iShares MSCI Japan (EWJ)||31.9||10.7|
In spite of the S&P 500 grinding a path to near all-time records, U.S. equities with high price-to-earnings ratios have been losing status. Both NASDAQ-oriented large-cap growth as well as Russell 2000 small-cap growth have been fading; micro-caps too. The fact that these asset groupings are slipping, alongside high-profile sectors like financials and “new technology” (e.g., networking, social media, Internet, etc.), is eerily reminiscent of previous bear market inceptions. (On a philosophical note, how did investors once again find themselves paying the largest premiums for shares of the poorest earnings prospects and/or the least financially stable?)
Rather than ring a bearish bell, it is more useful to address the authenticity of renewed interest in foreign assets. Foreign developed equities from Europe to Asia-Pacific (excluding Japan) have picked up speed. Even emerging markets are demonstrating marked improvement. This has been true in spite of the manufacturing contraction occurring in Japan; it has been happening in spite of an economic slowdown in China and a Russia-Ukraine turf battle. Indeed, it appears probable that confidence is rising with respect to the price-to-sales (P/S) and price-to-earnings (P/S) on overseas equities – something that is far more difficult to justify stateside.
The RSf data has anecdotal backing as well. An industry consulting firm that regularly surveys endowment and foundation money managers found that they are even more bullish about alternative and foreign investments than U.S. securities. Think hard assets, like those that GreenHaven Continuous Commodity (GCC) purports to represent. Think emerging markets as well. Endowment and foundation money say emerging market stocks should finish 2014 as one of the strongest asset classes.
Vanguard FTSE All-World (VEU) is one of the least expensive vehicles for gaining access to foreign equities. Granted, developed countries in Europe and the Pacific represent the bulk of the portfolio. Nevertheless, one can get his/her feet wet in the emerging markets with roughly 20% exposure in this particular basket. At present, VEU is positioned at a new 52-week high and remains well above key moving averages.