According to ETF Screen, the Relative Strength Factor (RSf) represents a percentile ranking of fund performance relative to all other funds in the universe. While it is measured over an entire year, the factor heavily weights recent performance to identify funds that have been accelerating versus those that have been deteriorating. The higher the percentile rank (0-99.99), the greater the relative strength.
One method to visualize meaningful changes over time is to see the data on a quarter-over-quarter basis. For example, iShares Biotechnology (IBB) registered a RSf rank of 98.9 at the beginning of February. At the start of May, though, the seemingly unstoppable biotech bellwether slipped to a modest 67.1. Conversely, Market Vectors Small Cap India (SCIF) had been woefully unappreciated back on 2/4/14 when it logged in at 23.4. Three months later, SCIF resides in the top decile (98.3) of the exchange-traded fund universe.
These individual stories may meet a criterion for “nice-to-know info.” However, when it comes to chin-rubbing fascination, one usually needs to see shifts in major asset classes.
|Are Sunnier Skies Ahead For These Asset Class ETFs?|
|RSf (2/4)||RSf (5/1)|
|GreenHaven Contin Commodity (GCC)||33||63.8|
|Vanguard REIT (VNQ)||30.5||55|
|SPDR S&P International Dividend (DWX)||27.1||77.3|
|iShares MSCI Pacific Ex-Japan (EPP)||18||52|
|Vanguard Emerging Markets (VWO)||12.7||36.1|
|Are Storm Clouds Hanging Over These Asset Class ETFs?|
|iShares Russell MicroCap (IWC)||93.9||43.2|
|Powershares NASDAQ 100 (QQQ)||91.2||76|
|Small Cap Via iShares Russell 2000 (IWM)||84.2||43.4|
|PowerShares DB Bullish U.S. Dollar (UUP)||35.6||11.5|
|iShares MSCI Japan (EWJ)||31.9||10.7|
In spite of the S&P 500 grinding a path to near all-time records, U.S. equities with high price-to-earnings ratios have been losing status. Both NASDAQ-oriented large-cap growth as well as Russell 2000 small-cap growth have been fading; micro-caps too. The fact that these asset groupings are slipping, alongside high-profile sectors like financials and “new technology” (e.g., networking, social media, Internet, etc.), is eerily reminiscent of previous bear market inceptions. (On a philosophical note, how did investors once again find themselves paying the largest premiums for shares of the poorest earnings prospects and/or the least financially stable?)