One can note that CUT has more of an “equal weighted” look to it among its top 10 companies, compared to WOOD.
Another significant difference here is in terms of expense ratios, as WOOD charges 48 basis points versus CUT coming in at 65 basis points. YTD, CUT has edged out WOOD in terms of performance, up 13.06% versus WOOD rallying 10.00%, but in the trailing one year period WOOD has outgained CUT (+9.52% versus 8.66%).
iShares S&P Global Timber & Forestry
For more information on Street One ETF research and ETF trade execution/liquidity services, contact Paul Weisbruch at [email protected].