The Fight Against 12(b)-1 Fees In ETFs Hits a Snag | Page 2 of 2 | ETF Trends

Judge Phyllis Hamilton ruled that the section of the Investment Company Act of 1940 provides a “remedy for a violation of ‘any provision of [the ICA], or of any rule, regulation, or order thereunder,’ rather than a distinct cause of action or basis for liability.” He also disagrees with the plaintiff’s interpretation of the Financial Planning casing, arguing that it is “irrelevant” to 12(b)-1 fees.

Other firms that may be affected by the Franklin decision on what law firm Milberg calls “excessive and unlawful” fees include: BlackRock, PIMCO, The Hartford, Ivy, MFS, First Eagle, Davis, Evergreen, Calamos, Van Kampen, Columbia, Lord Abbett, Loomis Sayles, Legg Mason, AllianceBerStein, Thornburg, Transamerica, Putnam, Russell, Allianz and Invesco.

For more information on ETFs and taxes, visit our taxes category.

Max Chen contributed to this article.