The rapid rise of artificial intelligence has spurred massive investments in data-center infrastructure across the United States. Companies like Amazon, Microsoft, Google, and Meta are building hyperscale facilities that form the backbone of AI development, supporting the immense computational needs for training and deploying advanced models. These projects, often involving billions of dollars, target rural or semi-rural regions where ample land and expandable electricity infrastructure are available.
However, as the pace of construction increases, many communities are pushing back. What was once viewed as nonintrusive digital infrastructure is now a politically charged land-use issue in several areas.
One of the chief concerns is energy demand. Modern AI data centers can in some cases require as much electricity as a major city, raising alarms that their arrival could strain local power grids and drive up electricity bills for residents. If utilities must expand generation or transmission capacity, the costs may be passed on to households. Some projects propose on-site gas turbines or backup generators, which add to worries about air pollution and public health.
Water usage is another flashpoint. Most data centers use water-based cooling systems to handle the heat from densely packed servers.
According to Forbes in 2023, U.S. data centers consumed an estimated 17 billion gallons of water, a figure expected to rise with broader AI adoption. In drought-prone or agricultural communities, residents fear these demands could compete with local water needs or overburden municipal systems.
Economic factors also shape local opposition. Many state and local governments compete for data center projects by offering tax breaks, infrastructure support, or discounted electricity. Around three dozen states provide tax incentives for data-center development. While intended to spur investment and job creation, critics question whether the economic payoff is as great as promised. Data centers typically create many construction jobs but only a small number of permanent positions, leading some to doubt if long-term tax revenues justify the subsidies.
Quality-of-life concerns are also prevalent. Communities cite noise from cooling equipment and generators, increased construction traffic, and the industrialization of rural landscapes. Such worries have already led to cancellations or delays of projects in several states, with advocacy groups estimating that tens of billions of dollars in proposed investments have been blocked or postponed due to local opposition.
Importantly, most debates are not anti-technology. Many communities acknowledge that robust digital infrastructure is key to economic growth and national competitiveness. To address concerns, policymakers and companies are exploring compromises, such as pledges to source renewable energy, greater transparency about water use, and increased financial support for local infrastructure.
For more news, information, and analysis, visit the ETF Strategist Content Hub.
As AI continues to expand, balancing technological advancement with local resource limitations is poised to become a central issue in U.S. infrastructure development. For investors, the growing political friction surrounding data centers could represent a significant challenge in building the physical foundation needed for the ongoing AI boom.
This report has been prepared for informational purposes only. It may include content generated or assisted by artificial intelligence (AI) tools. While the information presented is based on sources believed to be reliable, it should not be construed as personalized investment advice, considered a recommendation or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or strategy. Strategy Holdings, Attributions and or Sectors mentioned are as of the date indicated, subject to change, and should not be relied upon as current. This does not constitute legal or professional advice and is not tailored to the investment needs of any specific investor. Registration of an investment adviser does not imply any certain level of skill or training. Due to rapidly changing market conditions and the complexity of investment decisions, supplemental information may be required to make informed investment decisions, based on your individual investment objectives and suitability specifications. Investors should seek tailored advice and should understand that statements regarding future prospects of the financial market may not be realized, as past performance does not guarantee and/or is not indicative of future results. Content may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in whole or in part by any means without written permission from Globalt. Regarding permission, as well as to receive a copy of Globalt’s Form ADV Part 2 and Part 3, contact Globalt’s Chief Compliance Officer, 3200 Windy Hill Road SE, Suite 1550E, Atlanta GA 30339. You can obtain more information about Globalt Investments and its advisers via the Internet at adviserinfo.sec.gov, sponsored by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The opinions and some comments contained herein reflect the judgment of the author, as of the date noted.
Globalt Investments LLC (“Globalt” or the “Firm”) was founded in 1990. It has been registered with the SEC as an Investment Adviser pursuant to the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 since 1991. Effective October 1, 2023, Globalt is a limited liability company owned by the employees and succeeding the “Globalt Investments” which had been a separately identifiable division of Synovus Trust Co. N.A. (its affiliate since 2002). Globalt is no longer affiliated with Synovus. Globalt’s registration with the SEC does not imply any level of skill or training and should not be mistaken for an endorsement.