Climate Change Debate Weighs on Coal ETF | ETF Trends

The coal exchange traded fund outlook looks murky as large investors, and even developed countries, pull out of coal-fueled energy over greenhouse gas emission concerns.

Storebrand ASA, which manages $74 billion in assets in Norway, dumped 24 coal and oil-sands companies, including Peabody Energy Corp (NYSE: BTU), the largest U.S. coal producer, in an attempt to reduce fossil fuel holdings, Bloomberg reports. [Buffet Buys, Chanos Says Sell: The Technical Verdict on Energy]

Recently, Norway’s Labour Party proposed banning the $800 billion sovereign wealth fund from holding coal investments.

HSBC Holdings Plc. predicts that future curbs on carbon emissions beyond 2020 could put pressure on coal asset valuations by as much as 44%.

“There is the beginnings of divestment out of pure play coal by some investors,” Nick Robins, head of HSBC’s climate change center of excellence, said in the article. “There’s been a very marked rise in concern about this issue. There’s a recognition that as you move to a low-carbon economy that coal is potentially most vulnerable.”

The United Kingdom, along with the U.S., are minimizing funding to foreign coal-fired power plants, according to a Separate Bloomberg article. Funding would be allowed in “rare circumstances” when there are no alternatives or if it would help reduce poverty.

“We will work to get support of more countries and the multilateral development banks,” U.K. Energy Secretary Edward Davey said at the U.N. climate change conference.