http://www.etftrends.com/forum/ Keeping a grip on exchange-traded funds (ETFs) en Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:11:01 +0000 http://www.etftrends.com/forum/topic/etf-analyzer-200-day-ema#post-172 Thu, 22 Oct 2009 06:58:41 +0000 Tom 172@http://www.etftrends.com/forum/ <p>It's the percentage that the price is above the 200-day. </p> http://www.etftrends.com/forum/topic/etf-analyzer-200-day-ema#post-170 Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:26:08 +0000 bpmahone 170@http://www.etftrends.com/forum/ <p>What is the significance of the 200 day EMA column and the 50 day EMA column on the spreadsheet portion of the ETF analyzer - what do the percentages mean? Is it increase over a year, or difference between the price and the EMA, or something else? </p> http://www.etftrends.com/forum/topic/etf-analyzer-200-day-ema#post-61 Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:46:18 +0000 tgdameron@gmail.com 61@http://www.etftrends.com/forum/ <p>Thank you. I will work exclusively with the Analyzer. </p> http://www.etftrends.com/forum/topic/etf-analyzer-200-day-ema#post-60 Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:01:50 +0000 Tom 60@http://www.etftrends.com/forum/ <p>Thanks for all of your comments on our charting.</p> <p>If you look at our charting, the default view is six months. If you change it to a year, which is Yahoo's default view, they will align better. That being said, there are programming differences with the charts between various providers, which can make the tech aspect frustrating sometimes. We recommend you use the analyzer itself to view the 200-day moving average. </p> http://www.etftrends.com/forum/topic/etf-analyzer-200-day-ema#post-58 Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:54:56 +0000 tgdameron@gmail.com 58@http://www.etftrends.com/forum/ <p>Sorry for the incorrect symbol. EMZ should be EWZ. Edkirk's point also highlights essentially the same issue. I just need to feel comfortable that the EFT % above/below the 50/200 day average is spot-on verses cross referencing to Yahoo every time. </p> http://www.etftrends.com/forum/topic/etf-analyzer-200-day-ema#post-55 Mon, 20 Apr 2009 05:15:32 +0000 edkirk 55@http://www.etftrends.com/forum/ <p>To add to your questions, why is there a difference within Yahoo between the tracking under "trading above or below "50day and 200day" and the actual graph within Yahoo in which you can graph 50day and 200day moving average? In other words you could have an ETF position under the Portfolio Tab, but that same holding with the graph version will not be shown as trading above the 200 day moving average. Please help me understand? Edkirk </p> http://www.etftrends.com/forum/topic/etf-analyzer-200-day-ema#post-54 Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:56:39 +0000 Denny 54@http://www.etftrends.com/forum/ <p>The ETF Analyzer seems to be correct. However if you call up EWC on Yahoo's chart, it looks correct. EMZ does not appear to be a symbol for any ETF. </p> http://www.etftrends.com/forum/topic/etf-analyzer-200-day-ema#post-53 Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:31:18 +0000 tgdameron@gmail.com 53@http://www.etftrends.com/forum/ <p>Why is there a difference between the ETF Analyzer 200 Day EMA and the 200 Day EMA shown on Yahoo Finance? Which is more correct. Check out EMZ or EWC to see some real differences. </p>