<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 4 Reasons Active TIPs ETFs Could Be Needed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.etftrends.com/2009/08/4-reasons-active-tips-etfs-could-be-needed.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.etftrends.com/2009/08/4-reasons-active-tips-etfs-could-be-needed.html</link>
	<description>Keeping a grip on exchange traded funds (ETFs)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:45:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.etftrends.com/2009/08/4-reasons-active-tips-etfs-could-be-needed.html/comment-page-1#comment-5775</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 06:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.etftrends.com/?p=15878#comment-5775</guid>
		<description>I should add that the issue of rebalancing strategies are prevented in open ended funds, unlike ETFs. IWM has this problem when the Russel rebalances. Shrewd investors know in advance which stocks are going out, and which are going in and there is a very predictable change in values that can be exploited by hedge funds and the like. Unlike ETFs that rebalance like clockwork, certain open ended funds take a slow and steady rebalancing approach to avoid this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should add that the issue of rebalancing strategies are prevented in open ended funds, unlike ETFs. IWM has this problem when the Russel rebalances. Shrewd investors know in advance which stocks are going out, and which are going in and there is a very predictable change in values that can be exploited by hedge funds and the like. Unlike ETFs that rebalance like clockwork, certain open ended funds take a slow and steady rebalancing approach to avoid this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.etftrends.com/2009/08/4-reasons-active-tips-etfs-could-be-needed.html/comment-page-1#comment-5776</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 06:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.etftrends.com/?p=15878#comment-5776</guid>
		<description>Time and time again, active management has proven to be a loser. There is no shortage of evidence for this. Bonds, stocks, options, or anything else. They all lag the indicies long term. There is no advantage to active management of anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time and time again, active management has proven to be a loser. There is no shortage of evidence for this. Bonds, stocks, options, or anything else. They all lag the indicies long term. There is no advantage to active management of anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.etftrends.com/2009/08/4-reasons-active-tips-etfs-could-be-needed.html/comment-page-1#comment-5080</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 23:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.etftrends.com/?p=15878#comment-5080</guid>
		<description>I should add that the issue of rebalancing strategies are prevented in open ended funds, unlike ETFs. IWM has this problem when the Russel rebalances. Shrewd investors know in advance which stocks are going out, and which are going in and there is a very predictable change in values that can be exploited by hedge funds and the like. Unlike ETFs that rebalance like clockwork, certain open ended funds take a slow and steady rebalancing approach to avoid this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should add that the issue of rebalancing strategies are prevented in open ended funds, unlike ETFs. IWM has this problem when the Russel rebalances. Shrewd investors know in advance which stocks are going out, and which are going in and there is a very predictable change in values that can be exploited by hedge funds and the like. Unlike ETFs that rebalance like clockwork, certain open ended funds take a slow and steady rebalancing approach to avoid this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.etftrends.com/2009/08/4-reasons-active-tips-etfs-could-be-needed.html/comment-page-1#comment-5079</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 23:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.etftrends.com/?p=15878#comment-5079</guid>
		<description>Time and time again, active management has proven to be a loser. There is no shortage of evidence for this. Bonds, stocks, options, or anything else. They all lag the indicies long term. There is no advantage to active management of anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time and time again, active management has proven to be a loser. There is no shortage of evidence for this. Bonds, stocks, options, or anything else. They all lag the indicies long term. There is no advantage to active management of anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
