Special Report: 401(k) Plans, ETFs and You

July 22, 2009 at 1:00 pm by Tom Lydon      Bookmark and Share

401k ETFsAs the market melted down in 2008, many investors were so horrified at the state of their 401(k) statements that a number of them just stopped looking altogether. Now is the time to figure out how to fix a broken retirement system and explore the role exchange traded funds (ETFs) can have in it.

The importance of the 401(k) has only grown in recent years. A growing number of people entering into retirement (especially now that the Baby Boomer generation has begun to enter the ranks of retirees) and a broken social security system means that now more than ever, we’re responsible for the money we take with us into our golden years.

The average age of retirement in the United States is 63, but recent statistics show that it might not be as comfortable as most had hoped. Last year, Americans lost 18% of their net worth, according to a story by David Wyss for BusinessWeek. The Center for Retirement Research estimates that 43% of Americans are considered “at risk,” which means that they’d be unable to keep up their current standard of living after they retire.

Even worse, few Americans are taking decisive action, either by saving, paying off debt or taking advantage of tools such as 401(k)s that are being made available to them.

A Broken System

Americans historically have relied on social security to fund their retirements, but fewer and fewer people can count on this. Many projections suggest that both Social Security and Medicare are going to run out of money within the lifetime of most Baby Boomers, Wyss’s story suggests. And company pension plans are slowly moving toward extinction, too.

Saving for retirement has been a growing problem, and in recent years it’s only become worse. At the end of 2007, the median household in the 55-to-64 age group had total financial assets of just $72,400, according to the 2007 Survey of Consumer Finances. That figure may be even lower after the market meltdown.

This makes the 401(k) more important than ever. Unfortunately, it’s a broken system, which we’ll go into in more detail in the next section. But the good news is that there are solutions out there – it’s just going to require a little noise-making to get it done.

The Trouble with 401(k) Plans

The criticism of the 401(k) industry is getting louder and harder to ignore, and even Congress is paying attention. Rep. George Miller has stepped forward with a number of reforms that many investors and experts on the industry would love to see implemented.

There are two primary issues at play when it comes to why 401(k)s are broken:

  • The fee disclosure is extremely poor. In a report for 60 Minutes this April, Rep. Miller held up a prospectus and challenged anyone to find the dozen or more fees that investors are socked with each year. Some of them are easily located; others are kept a mystery. And forget reading the prospectus – it’s a rare one that’s written in plain English. Hidden and buried fees have taken about $2 trillion from investors in the last year.
  • There’s a lack of good education out there for investors. Many people, when they get jobs and choose their 401(k) options, are deluged with choices. And those choices are mediocre at best, the 60 Minutes report said. Often investors with little or no expertise are being asked to make difficult choices about the very investments that could determine their futures.

There’s also a lack of awareness on the  part of employers. A recent survey covered  in US News & World Report found that about 73% of employers think that their employees know how much they’re paying in fees. Only 29% of employees are actually aware of what they’re paying. That’s a huge disconnect.

Blaine F. Aikin for Investment News recently wrote that an investment fiduciary’s duty of loyalty demands that the investor’s best interests guide the decision-making process. Mutual funds make up the majority of 401(k) plan options – is that really what’s happening here?

Why Aren’t ETFs a Staple?

It’s true that an increasing number of 401(k) plans are offering ETFs, but this is hardly the norm. Most still use high-priced and opaque mutual funds. Anyone who understands the benefits of ETFs might be scratching their heads over this.

The industry has long claimed that putting ETFs into 401(k) plans might make them more expensive and difficult to operate, since mutual funds are only traded once a day at the end of the day. ETFs are traded intraday, just as a stock would be. The technology didn’t exist, was the claim. Fund companies also claimed that there wasn’t enough of a demand for ETFs to be incorporated into 401(k) plans. The chart below illustrates how the ETF industry has grown in recent years, though:

ETF(Chart courtesy of State Street Global Advisors)

The ETF industry is hungry for this piece of the market. At the end of 2007, 401(k)s had about $3 trillion in assets, and $1.7 trillion of that went to mutual funds. Naturally, the ETF side of things wants a share.

But these days, there are a number of plans that are blasting that myth:

  • Darwin Abrahamson, the CEO of Invest n Retire, has been doing this for years. His proprietary system helped stick a fork on the notion that ETFs and 401(k)s were like oil and water.
  • iShares has the iShares 401(k) Program, which was designed to assist financial advisors who want to have ETFs as standard options in their 401(k) plans. The program identifies administrative providers and networks that offer competitively priced access to ETFs.
  • ING Direct’s ShareBuilder 401(k) program is targeted toward small businesses with 1-50 employees. The plan has been around since November 2005, but ING took it over in November 2007. ING’s plan comes with a lineup of 16 funds, which might seem small, but the idea is to keep it simple. Offering more than that, they feel, simply becomes confusing for investors.
  • The owner of Lafayette Copier Sales & Service Inc. in Lafayette, IN, had been using a 401(k) plan that only offered mutual funds. But earlier this year, the plan’s service provider worked out a system that allows participants to create their own portfolios and freely transact any iShares ETF on the market.

These aren’t the only plans offering ETFs, either; those who offer them are appearing on the scene with increasing frequency. More employers, in fact, are making it easier for workers in 401(k) plans to own ETFs, but it’s not a change that is going to happen overnight, says Eleanor Laise for The Wall Street Journal.

But even some big players in the industry are betting on a shift in tide for the stodgy 401(k) market. BlackRock Inc. last month noted the potential for growth index funds have in retirement plans. Ascensus Inc., a 401(k) record keeper, says it has gotten more than 100 inquiries from employers since they added ETFs to their platform in May.

And in a survey of 150 employers by Hewitt Associates, 17% said they’re likely to replace some or all of their plan’s actively managed options with index funds. That figure is up 8% from just a year ago.

This, combined with the fee disclosure bill, could help both employers and employees recognize that index funds can deliver better returns at a lower cost.

Making the Most of Your Current 401(k) Plan

While the use of ETFs within 401(k) plans is clearly growing, the push is not over yet. If your employer doesn’t currently offer a 401(k) plan that incorporates ETFs, you’re not completely helpless. Two things you can do right now to make it happen are:

1. Tell your employer that’s what you want. Many people are still learning about ETFs. Unlike mutual funds, they’re not exactly a household name. Perhaps your employer simply doesn’t know about them. If that’s the case, give an education or pass along some resources. But let your employer know that you want them. Encourage your colleagues to ask, too.

2. Let your congressperson know you support legislation to bring more clarity and sanity into 401(k) plans when it comes to both fees and options within them. Advocate not just for yourself, but for millions of other Americans who deserve something better for their futures.

The squeaky wheel, after all, will get the grease. In the meantime, though, there are still ways that you can be sure you’re getting the most out of your 401(k) plans while you wait for some ETFs.

  • Save, save, save. Undersaving has always been a major problem, but in these hard times it seems to be prevailing.  Dwindling down some of your wants and desires to needs may enable you to save a few more pennies and get you over that bump.
  • Utilizing company matches. This may be difficult because many employers are decreasing or even eliminating this policy.  If this is the case, up your contribution to the maximum that the IRS will allow, $16,500 per individual for the current year and $22,000 for those of you 50 and older. Not only will this boost your nest egg, it will lower your contribution to Uncle Sam’s pocket.
  • Know the rules of your plan. Depending on your plan, there can be rules that can be costly if they’re broken. Some of these limits include the length of time you must hold a fund or limits on how often you can trade per year.
  • Pay attention to fees. This is one area that would really reap the rewards if ETFs were routinely included in plans.  The majority of 401(k)s are focused on mutual funds, which generally have an expense ratio of around 1.02%.  Know what you’re paying.
  • Encourage workers to save. Many companies don’t offer 401(k)s because of hefty costs and administrative issues and many workers that do have access to 401(k)s simply don’t utilize them. Perhaps the government can make it a bit easier for small business to offer 401(k)s.

Do you know of a 401(k) plan that offers ETFs? Feel free to share it in the comments and let others know!

For past special reports, view our special report page.

Share this post:
  • email
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Tipd
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis

Tags: , , ,

Subscribe to Our Daily E-mail Newsletter

Enter your e-mail address below to sign up for our daily e-mail newsletter, the Daily Market Update. We will never share your e-mail address with third parties.

Subscribe to Our RSS Feed

Click here to subscribe to our RSS feed

  • DDM
    My employer's 401k plan has a "self-directed brokerage" option which potentially allows all or part of the account to be controlled exclusively by the employee, who can then invest in ETFs. There are fees associated with this, of course, including a commission fee per trade execution. But having the ability to effectively "short" a particular area of the market with an inverse ETF gives me a greater sense of control than I'd otherwise have if I were only speculating on the long side. At the same time, greater transparency with fees is still needed.
  • Letsgetitright
    ETFs help, but they will not solve the huge issues in 401(k) unless they overcome recordkeeping provider resistance and they are bundled with independent advice and management.

    ETFs aren't prominent for two simple reasons: Recordkeeping provider technology and economics..

    Approximately 70% of 401(k) assets and participants (not plans) are recorrdkept by 7 recordkeepers. These recordkeeping platforms cannot recordkeep ETFs for reasons that you have alluded to in your piece. (Similar challenges were confronted--if not resolved--in the mid 90s when popular notion was that individual securities/self-directed brokerage were the answer to all 401(k) problems)

    ETF providers need to understand and address the distribution dynamics of 401(k). Recordkeeping providers and plan sponsors are distributors. And question one of any distributor is "What's in this for me?". And here altruism need not apply.

    The seven dominant providers do not want to recordkeep ETFs for economic reasons; which they are not really good at confronting, let alone resolving. (Aside: Remember that this has been an industry where leaders have always believed they could outgrow problems of cost, or that the cost problems could be handled by their successor) All but two of these recordkeepers are asset managers, versus pure administrators. For too long, participants have underwriiten the cost of administration with the high fee revenues of the funds--proprietary or outside funds. ETFs generate a fraction of this and thus jeopardize the actual plan costs that might be paid by a plan sponsor , but are currently born by participants. . . So ETFs threaten both asset managing and purely recordkeeping administrative providers (less revenue) as well as the plan sponsors (higher costs).

    Until the big seven figure out a way to replace the revenue without dramatically raising prices on their plan sponsors, you will not see a grand embrace of ETFs . . . Regardless of what the participant wants.

    ETFs for 401(k)? Not without independent advice and management.

    A major point and flaw of the 401(k) that you did not address, but is related to ETFs and the major need to fix the 401(k), is the bald fact that self-direction has neither been embraced or works . . . (But when the industry has been led and dominated by providers who serve, and seek to empower, self-directed investors why should we be surprised?) The majority of 401(k) investors will never self-direct. No matter how many 'custom brochures' or enrollment meetings they are exposed to; they want someone to 'do it for them'. Ideally it is 'someone' aligned and motivated by the participant interests, but whose presence benefits all players--participant, sponsor and recordkeeping provider. (And that ain't 85% of those broker-dealers specializing in retirement)

    So like SDB in the mid 90s, an ETF offering will be consumed by a small, informed subsegment of participant populations unless they respect and address the distributor truths of 401(k), and are bundled with independent advice and management.

    Until the 401(K) product is redefined--service, pricing, economics to providers--participant problems won't be fixed and ETF's will not enjoy high consumption. Automatic 401(k)s--or DBs without the guarantee--could work--Automatic enrollment, deferral rate, automatic deferral to an independently managed solution of ETFs, with an opt-out option for the truly self-directed. But this means a much smaller revenue pool for the recordkeeping provider. And unless this solution offers the recordkeeper a way to dramatically reduce their cost, and thereby sustain a respectable margin, it would force a much higher bill to the plan sponsor. There is a way to reduce this provider cost: blow up and eliminate what is currently called employee communications. (Employee communications has always been a curiously important beauty contest at point-of-sale. And an emotionally invested issue among the human resource community. But you would be hard-pressed to find anything that has consumed more dollars and energy and produced less participant benefit ) Alas, this is much easier said than done and no one wants to be first.

    I look forward to the day when one of the 401(K) providers has the courage to stand out and fix the 401(k) with a redefined product. This will open the doors for ETFs.
  • steveburkett
    Tom,

    You make some great points here. I think ETFs are excellent investment vehicles when used appropriately and they certainly have potential inside of 401(k) plans. I make the assumption in this response that most 401(k) plans and even most investors would use ETFs as a way of delivering low-cost index options to participants or other end investors.

    There lies at least one good reason why ETFs are not yet prominent in 401(k) plans – high costs. While the underlying ETF most-likely delivers a low-cost index investment option, once it is delivered to participants via a recordkeeping platform, it can actually end up costing the participant more than if the plan had offered a comparable open-ended index mutual fund. This is because most recordkeepers will assess some sort of asset-based fee in order to accommodate the trading costs of the ETF. It’s difficult to delineate how much of these costs are attributable to ETF trading costs versus plan administration and recordkeeping costs as the ETF trading costs are often-times rolled into recordkeeping as one ‘asset-based’ fee.

    There is certainly some great potential for using ETFs inside of 401(k) plans. However, one should bear in mind that comparisons should normally be made to other open-ended index mutual funds since our choice in this example is between using an ETF or an open-ended index fund.

    For example, if a 401(k) plan wanted to offer a ‘Total US Stock Market Index’ – they might consider Vanguard Total Stock Market Index ‘VTSMX’ which has an expense ratio of 0.18% OR the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF ‘VTI’, which has an expense ratio of 0.09%. If the recordkeeping costs associated with the ETF exceed 0.09%, the plan would likely be better off going with the open-ended fund, ‘VTSMX’.

    Some 401(k) recordkeepers have made great strides in delivering ETFs to their clients for reasonable costs. There is definitely some good potential here but also remember that if we are performing a comparison as simple as ‘VTI’ to ‘VTSMX’, then the promise of ETFs delivering a better 401(k) plan, is most-likely overblown.

    -Steve Burkett
    Palisade Investments

    www.palisadeinvestments.com


    This posting is listed for discussion purposes only and in no way construes investment advice or recommendations. Analyzing 401(k) plan costs is complex and involves many different components. We provide comprehensive analysis of 401(k) plans including all fees and recordkeeper searches. Many considerations must be made when considering 401(k) vendors including but not limited to costs.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Special Report

Recent TV Appearances

Now Available:

The ETF Trend
Following Playbook

ETF Trends' new book is now available. Click here for details. Or order online from one of these bookstores:
Amazon        Barnes and Noble


iMoney

ETF Trends' book iMoney is available. Click here for details. Or order online from one of these bookstores:
Amazon        Amazon