ETF Investing: Buy-and-Hold vs. Moving Averages

July 06, 2009 at 6:00 am by Tom Lydon      Bookmark and Share

ETF moving averageWhen looking at performances of stocks and exchange traded funds (ETFs), traders try to decipher the secrets of the moving average (MA) in an attempt to beat the markets. One performance system may hold the key to beating buy-and-hold investing.

The 10-month Moving Average Crossover (MAC) system is an investment strategy that beats buy-and-hold in absolute performance and risk-adjusted return, writes Theodore Wong for Advisor Perspectives. You would usually buy when prices are above the moving average, and sell when prices are below.

Wong compared the performance of MAC and buy-and-hold strategies using Compound Annual Growth Rates (CAGRs) and monthly data spanning the last 138 years for the S&P 500 total return index. The buy-and-hold benchmark provided returns of 8.6% over the period while CAGRs below 11 months consistently beat buy-and-hold.

The MAC system beats buy-and-hold across all MA sections as shown by the risk-adjusted returns using the ratio of monthly CAGR to standard deviations. Both up and down volatility are categorized as risk under standard deviation. The more relevant measure of downside risk is equity drawdown, or the percentage decline from a recent equity peak. Over the 138 year period, buy-and-hold provides a -85% maximum drawdown and an average drawdown of -26%, whereas MAC showed maximum drawdown of -15% and average drawdown of -4%.

In bear markets, the six-month MAC showed the highest CAGR followed by, respectively, buy-and-hold and 23-month MAC, remarks Theodore Wong for Advisor Perspectives. The average drawdown for the six-month and 23-month MAC are 2% and 4%, repsectively. Average drawdown for buy-and-hold was 26%, any drawdown higher than 10% in the 138-year span were rare. The data reveals buy-and-holders could take 10 to 25 years before breaking even.

MAC annual returns were usually higher than buy-and-hold at same levels of risk. In a risk-and-return tradeoff scheme, buy-and-hold style offered no adequate risk premiums to make up for the wide range of volatility.

By comparing monthly performances between MAC and buy-and-hold, the MAC system captures reutrns in bull markets and avoids most bear markets.

Wong’s findings are certainly interesting. We’ve made no secret of our opinion regarding the buy-and-hold philosophy, and we’re clear proponents of trend following with set entry signals and stop losses in place. Whatever signals you choose to follow, be sure that your strategy is firm and adhered to without fail for the best results.

Max Chen contributed to this article.

Share this post:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Tipd
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis

Tags: ,

Subscribe to Our Daily E-mail Newsletter

Enter your e-mail address below to sign up for our daily e-mail newsletter, the Daily Market Update. We will never share your e-mail address with third parties.

Subscribe to Our RSS Feed

Click here to subscribe to our RSS feed

  • ninan
    Your strategy of selling below 200 MA or on a 8% decline from the top seems fine. When do you enter after the 8% decline if you are still above the 200MA
  • deep
    Doesn't this and other methods advocated here using the MA not just result in buying high and selling low? For example if someone were to buy into an ETF which then proceeds to tank and go beneath the moving average.

    I think it would be helpful to expand on the MA techniques often described here with additional if-then recommendations. Also address the issue of security trending up or down even if purchased above the MA.

    E.G.

    If below EMA and trending down = sell and stay out
    If above EMA and trending down = set stop for exit
    If above EMA and trending up = hold
    If below EMA and trending up = set order for entry

    Then

    If exiting and ETF trends back up = Set a buy order to buy in at exit price
    If exiting and ETF trending down = stay out
    If entering and ETF trending up = stay in
    If entering and ETF trending down = set a stop loss (sell) order to sell at entry price

    Comments / thoughts / feedback?
  • Tom Lydon
    Ninan, the money is considered a free agent - it doesn't necessarily have to go back into the position you just sold.

    Deep, the trend following method is designed to give investors the opportunity to take a position in time for a potential long-term uptrend. Obviously, not every position is going to go on those long-term trends, but when one does, it could lead to success. The plan is designed to eliminate emotions and enter/exit the market based on signals. A more thorough discussion of the trend-following strategy can be found in our special report:

    http://www.etftrends.com/2008/07/an-etf-trend-f...
  • deep
    Tom, thanks for your response. I've read that posts of yours, as well as your book and other posts here on the moving average technique. I've been applying the ideas, but look forward to elaboration or further details. For example, what might be some quantitative / emotion eliminated approaches to evaluating the potential for a long term up trend? You do a great job of segmenting the market and evaluating the various ETF tools out there, what analytical tools could people use to evaluate trading outlook? The ETF analyzer can show us performance to date, but quantitative approaches could be used for potential performance? This is especially relevant to your position that buy and hold is dead and it better to pay attention to the trends. Perhaps this has already been addressed through technical analysis or magic eight balls but I'd be interested in hearing your take nonetheless.
  • Tom Lydon
    Thanks for your comments, deep. In our opinion, the potential for a long-term uptrend exists when the position crosses its 200-day moving average. It doesn't always pan out, but it has you in place to participate if the long-term uptrend does materialize. Other non-emotional ways to evaluate a position include looking at the fundamentals, examining your risk tolerance, diversification within the fund, your current position and fees. If all that lines up and the position is right for you, take it.
  • darren
    - From Wikipedia:
    Standard & Poor's introduced its first stock index in 1923. Before 1957, its primary daily stock market index was the "S&P 90," a value weighted index based on 90 stocks. By linking this index to the S&P 500 index, the latter has been extended back to 1918. Standard & Poor's also published a weekly index of 423 companies. The S&P 500 index in its present form began on March 4, 1957.

    So how do you have 138 years of monthly data?
  • Prof. Robert Shiller has maintained a database of historic S&P performance that begins in January 1871, available to the public. You can find his research and other interesting things here:
    http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2006/...
blog comments powered by Disqus

Recent TV Appearances


Now Available:

The ETF Trend
Following Playbook

ETF Trends' new book is now available. Click here for details. Or order online from one of these bookstores:
Amazon        Barnes and Noble


iMoney

ETF Trends' book iMoney is available. Click here for details. Or order online from one of these bookstores:
Amazon        Amazon