Why You Can’t Count Out California Muni Bond ETFs
May 20th 2009 at 12:00pm by Tom Lydon
California’s citizens took to the polls yesterday to vote on measures that would have helped close the $21 billion budget gap. They rejected all but one, but that doesn’t necessarily mean you should count out the state’s muni bond exchange traded funds (ETFs).
Stacey Vanek-Smith for Marketplace reports that the $21 billion-plus budget shortfall is on the line and deficits are not an option. If tax revenue drops, states either have to cut costs or find more money.
The voters in California voted on measures that would slash the budget for health care and education, two important areas that are already experiencing budgeting problems. The only measure approved was one barring pay increases for state officials, reports Reuters. Since the other measures didn’t pass, the U.S. Treasury may be the next place to search.
The government has already handed out around $150 billion to cover budgeting deficits, so where do we turn next? Perhaps a mix of issuing bonds, raising taxes and cutting budgets may work.
Defaults on muni bonds issued by state and local governments have been historically low, but they are a risk to be mindful of nonetheless. Having an ETF with bonds of varying maturities can help diversify you and help lower these risks.
- PowerShares Insured California Muni Bond (PWZ): up 9.5% year-to-date; current yield 4.63%
- SPDR Barclays Capital California Muni Bond (CXA): up 7% year-to-date; current yield 4.17%
- iShares S&P California Muni Bond (CMF): up 4.8% year-to-date; current yield 3.58%
The opinions and forecasts expressed herein are solely those of Tom Lydon, and may not actually come to pass. Information on this site should not be used or construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation for any product.