<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oil and Gas ETFs Are Jumping, But Why?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.etftrends.com/2009/05/oil-and-gas-etfs-are-jumping-but-why.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.etftrends.com/2009/05/oil-and-gas-etfs-are-jumping-but-why.html</link>
	<description>Keeping a grip on exchange traded funds (ETFs)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:28:06 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://www.etftrends.com/2009/05/oil-and-gas-etfs-are-jumping-but-why.html/comment-page-1/#comment-4284</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 21:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.etftrends.com/?p=9621#comment-4284</guid>
		<description>Only WTI got down to £32 and not for long,  Brent barely got below $40 and is a better measure of oil prices than WTI as its based on 1.5m Barrels a day, much greater than WTI.  A better question would how did oil prices fall 75% in 12 weeks and looks like it was caused by traders having to close long positions after September as  much as by demand destructions.   Some recovery in prices was always going to happen when estimated cost of the newer sources is above $40 a barrel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only WTI got down to £32 and not for long,  Brent barely got below $40 and is a better measure of oil prices than WTI as its based on 1.5m Barrels a day, much greater than WTI.  A better question would how did oil prices fall 75% in 12 weeks and looks like it was caused by traders having to close long positions after September as  much as by demand destructions.   Some recovery in prices was always going to happen when estimated cost of the newer sources is above $40 a barrel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://www.etftrends.com/2009/05/oil-and-gas-etfs-are-jumping-but-why.html/comment-page-1/#comment-4772</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 21:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.etftrends.com/?p=9621#comment-4772</guid>
		<description>Only WTI got down to Â£32 and not for long,  Brent barely got below $40 and is a better measure of oil prices than WTI as its based on 1.5m Barrels a day, much greater than WTI.  A better question would how did oil prices fall 75% in 12 weeks and looks like it was caused by traders having to close long positions after September as  much as by demand destructions.   Some recovery in prices was always going to happen when estimated cost of the newer sources is above $40 a barrel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only WTI got down to Â£32 and not for long,  Brent barely got below $40 and is a better measure of oil prices than WTI as its based on 1.5m Barrels a day, much greater than WTI.  A better question would how did oil prices fall 75% in 12 weeks and looks like it was caused by traders having to close long positions after September as  much as by demand destructions.   Some recovery in prices was always going to happen when estimated cost of the newer sources is above $40 a barrel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
