<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The $64K Question: What Do I Do Now?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.etftrends.com/2008/10/the-64k-question-for-etfers-what-do-i-do-now.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.etftrends.com/2008/10/the-64k-question-for-etfers-what-do-i-do-now.html</link>
	<description>Keeping a grip on exchange traded funds (ETFs)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:14:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: godmadescience</title>
		<link>http://www.etftrends.com/2008/10/the-64k-question-for-etfers-what-do-i-do-now.html/comment-page-1/#comment-5273</link>
		<dc:creator>godmadescience</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 04:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.etftrends.com/?p=5926#comment-5273</guid>
		<description>I like the trend-following strategy that Tom teaches here. I wouldn&#039;t suggest dollar-cost-averaging with a trend-following strategy, as that could be counterproductive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The idea behind trend following is that an ETF that is going up will continue to go up for quite a while. One that is going down will continue to go down. So if it goes up, buy some more. If it goes down, sell some or all of your holdings.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dollar-cost-averaging, on the other hand, relies on mean-reversion. If something is going down, it&#039;s bound to come back. So if it goes down, buy some more. This is the opposite of the trend-following strategy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Buy-and-hold does you good in non-retirement accounts if you want tax efficiency, although I would argue that tax efficiency isn&#039;t always worth sitting through a market crash. But why do it in retirement accounts where you don&#039;t have to pay taxes anyway? I don&#039;t see any reason not to follow trends in retirement accounts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the trend-following strategy that Tom teaches here. I wouldn&#39;t suggest dollar-cost-averaging with a trend-following strategy, as that could be counterproductive.</p>
<p>The idea behind trend following is that an ETF that is going up will continue to go up for quite a while. One that is going down will continue to go down. So if it goes up, buy some more. If it goes down, sell some or all of your holdings.</p>
<p>Dollar-cost-averaging, on the other hand, relies on mean-reversion. If something is going down, it&#39;s bound to come back. So if it goes down, buy some more. This is the opposite of the trend-following strategy.</p>
<p>Buy-and-hold does you good in non-retirement accounts if you want tax efficiency, although I would argue that tax efficiency isn&#39;t always worth sitting through a market crash. But why do it in retirement accounts where you don&#39;t have to pay taxes anyway? I don&#39;t see any reason not to follow trends in retirement accounts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Lydon</title>
		<link>http://www.etftrends.com/2008/10/the-64k-question-for-etfers-what-do-i-do-now.html/comment-page-1/#comment-2928</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Lydon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.etftrends.com/?p=5926#comment-2928</guid>
		<description>Aase, this strategy can be applied to nearly any kind of security. Some are more volatile than others - individual stocks, for example, might see bigger moves in one day than a broad ETF, so you might be doing more buying and selling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aase, this strategy can be applied to nearly any kind of security. Some are more volatile than others &#8211; individual stocks, for example, might see bigger moves in one day than a broad ETF, so you might be doing more buying and selling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aase</title>
		<link>http://www.etftrends.com/2008/10/the-64k-question-for-etfers-what-do-i-do-now.html/comment-page-1/#comment-2907</link>
		<dc:creator>Aase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.etftrends.com/?p=5926#comment-2907</guid>
		<description>I heard your name- Tom Lydon- today in Andre Horowitz&#039; podcast from 1/5/09. From there I went to this website, very, very interesting! 

My question is: could the general buy/sell &#039;rules&#039; mentioned on this website be applied to mutual funds (F-class) as well? (I realize that mutual funds are only traded once a day).

We are in a very diversified portfolio of 7 mutual funds,- but no ETFs. Since Jan. 2008 we have consistently been &quot;$ cost averaging&quot; extra cash into stock in a non-401k account every single week, because we are way off our target %stock. We also max 401k contributions in another account. We are in for the long term, but it seems that your &quot;rules&quot; would have worked out well even for the mutual funds..... Alternatively we could use the extra cash and buy EFTs in the future, according to the &quot;rules&quot;. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard your name- Tom Lydon- today in Andre Horowitz&#8217; podcast from 1/5/09. From there I went to this website, very, very interesting! </p>
<p>My question is: could the general buy/sell &#8216;rules&#8217; mentioned on this website be applied to mutual funds (F-class) as well? (I realize that mutual funds are only traded once a day).</p>
<p>We are in a very diversified portfolio of 7 mutual funds,- but no ETFs. Since Jan. 2008 we have consistently been &#8220;$ cost averaging&#8221; extra cash into stock in a non-401k account every single week, because we are way off our target %stock. We also max 401k contributions in another account. We are in for the long term, but it seems that your &#8220;rules&#8221; would have worked out well even for the mutual funds&#8230;.. Alternatively we could use the extra cash and buy EFTs in the future, according to the &#8220;rules&#8221;. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
