October 13, 2008 at 12:00 pm by Tom Lydon
Is there actually a “safe investment” in all of this chaos that investors can turn to when CDs, money markets and exchange traded funds (ETFs) all seem to be vulnerable?
In general, the money invested in traditional stock exchange-traded funds appears safe from rampaging credit markets; not safe from market movements, of course, but safe from the kind of credit risks that killed the Lehman ETNs, reports Matthew Hougan for Index Universe.
For example, the investment into iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (IVV) is like buying a sliver of of each of the 500 stocks held by those funds. This is different than an ETN, where you are buying a debt note from the underwriting bank.
Fixed-income funds operate much like traditional equity ETFs, in which investors hold a pro-rata share of the underlying markets. All such funds are exposed to the risks of the fixed-income market, which include defaults and even illiquidity.
Precious metals funds are very safe, Hougan says, as they hold the metals as their sole asset. The metal is stored in a vault with a custodian bank, and while there are scenarios in which the holdings could be lost, they’re extraordinary. Most currency ETFs hold the currency as their sole asset, meaning that they’re essentially bank accounts that come with all the rights and risks of other bank accounts.
ETFs have been scrutinized as of late and one of the biggest questions has to do with tracking error. Most of the tracking error presented is actually a positive thing, says Jim Wiandt for Seeking Alpha.
Much of the tracking error occurring now is due to cash being king right now, share lending, managing cash flow, and index changes. The more cash at hand, the more positive tracking error you get in your ETFs for the moment.
Tags: Fixed-income, IVV, Precious Metals, S&P 500
Share: 
Digg | 
Bookmark at Del.icio.us | 
Subscribe to our RSS Feed
October 13th, 2008 at 2:06 pm
TOM, TOM!
Get ur head up out of the sand. Not ALL of the precious metal ETFs and FUNDS have ALL of their supposed assets in their possession, under lock and key, with a custodian. Some have paper promises because they cannot get delivery on all they need and some have loaned out (for a supposed profit) some of their hard goods. Comes a crunch and guess who ends up holding an empty bag.
October 13th, 2008 at 3:50 pm
Gunther,
You are correct. As the story we referred to in the link points out, these really only include GLD, IAU and SLV in the United States.
Investors need to take care and be aware that just because a fund has a precious metal in the name, it doesn’t mean the metal is actually held.