<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China&#8217;s ETF Growth Rooted In Strength; Olympics Negligible Economically</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.etftrends.com/2008/08/chinas-etf-growth-rooted-in-strength-olympics-negligible-economically.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.etftrends.com/2008/08/chinas-etf-growth-rooted-in-strength-olympics-negligible-economically.html</link>
	<description>Keeping a grip on exchange traded funds (ETFs)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:15:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Lydon</title>
		<link>http://www.etftrends.com/2008/08/chinas-etf-growth-rooted-in-strength-olympics-negligible-economically.html/comment-page-1/#comment-1485</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Lydon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.etftrends.com/?p=4456#comment-1485</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Donato.

We reread what we wrote, and realize that it was misleading and didn&#039;t represent what we were trying to get across. It&#039;s been changed, and hopefully it&#039;s a little more clear now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Donato.</p>
<p>We reread what we wrote, and realize that it was misleading and didn&#8217;t represent what we were trying to get across. It&#8217;s been changed, and hopefully it&#8217;s a little more clear now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donato</title>
		<link>http://www.etftrends.com/2008/08/chinas-etf-growth-rooted-in-strength-olympics-negligible-economically.html/comment-page-1/#comment-1447</link>
		<dc:creator>Donato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 23:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.etftrends.com/?p=4456#comment-1447</guid>
		<description>What am I missing?  You mention sales gaining 23% in June, China’s economic strength, and growth in China is surging.  How do the charts of the four China ETF’s above [(FXI) (GXC) (PGJ) &amp; (SNO)] reflect any of this?  It anything, they all seem to indicate a downward trend since last November 2007.  As well as being below their 200 day EMA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What am I missing?  You mention sales gaining 23% in June, China’s economic strength, and growth in China is surging.  How do the charts of the four China ETF’s above [(FXI) (GXC) (PGJ) &amp; (SNO)] reflect any of this?  It anything, they all seem to indicate a downward trend since last November 2007.  As well as being below their 200 day EMA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
