Backtested Data Can Be Useful With ETFs, But Use With Caution

July 02, 2008 at 1:00 am by Tom Lydon      Bookmark and Share

Eco_iq_testWhen it comes to hypothetical returns for exchange traded funds (ETFs), is back-tested performance data misleading?

A slew of the newer ETFs are based on customized indexes that have no real-time performance history, so providers display hypothetical numbers, reports Dan Jamieson for Investment News.

Here are a few examples of back-tested results:

  • PowerShares Dynamic Market Portfolio (PWC): 10-year returns of 8.5% compared to 3.5% for the S&P 500.
  • PowerShares FTSE/RAFI US 1000 Portfolio (PRF): annualized 10-year return of 7.1% compared to 3.5% for the S&P 500.
  • WisdomTree Total Dividend Fund (DTD): gave a 10-year return of 6.4% compared to Russell 3000’s 3.9%.

Remember, a back-test is just one tool used in evaluating a strategy. Keep in mind that hypothetical results are meaningless unless third-party researchers are going to validate findings.

And while having some kind of a track record is helpful, it’s extremely important to remember that the past is not indicative of the future.

Share this post:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Tipd
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis


Subscribe to Our Daily E-mail Newsletter

Enter your e-mail address below to sign up for our daily e-mail newsletter, the Daily Market Update. We will never share your e-mail address with third parties.

Subscribe to Our RSS Feed

Click here to subscribe to our RSS feed

blog comments powered by Disqus

Recent TV Appearances

iMoney

ETF Trends' new book iMoney is now available. Click here for details. Or order online from one of these bookstores:
Amazon        Amazon