Backtested Data Can Be Useful With ETFs, But Use With Caution

July 02, 2008 at 1:00 am by Tom Lydon      Bookmark and Share

Eco_iq_testWhen it comes to hypothetical returns for exchange traded funds (ETFs), is back-tested performance data misleading?

A slew of the newer ETFs are based on customized indexes that have no real-time performance history, so providers display hypothetical numbers, reports Dan Jamieson for Investment News.

Here are a few examples of back-tested results:

  • PowerShares Dynamic Market Portfolio (PWC): 10-year returns of 8.5% compared to 3.5% for the S&P 500.
  • PowerShares FTSE/RAFI US 1000 Portfolio (PRF): annualized 10-year return of 7.1% compared to 3.5% for the S&P 500.
  • WisdomTree Total Dividend Fund (DTD): gave a 10-year return of 6.4% compared to Russell 3000’s 3.9%.

Remember, a back-test is just one tool used in evaluating a strategy. Keep in mind that hypothetical results are meaningless unless third-party researchers are going to validate findings.

And while having some kind of a track record is helpful, it’s extremely important to remember that the past is not indicative of the future.

Share this post:
  • email
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Tipd
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis


Subscribe to Our Daily E-mail Newsletter

Enter your e-mail address below to sign up for our daily e-mail newsletter, the Daily Market Update. We will never share your e-mail address with third parties.

Subscribe to Our RSS Feed

Click here to subscribe to our RSS feed

blog comments powered by Disqus
Special Report

Recent TV Appearances

Now Available:

The ETF Trend
Following Playbook

ETF Trends' new book is now available. Click here for details. Or order online from one of these bookstores:
Amazon        Barnes and Noble


iMoney

ETF Trends' book iMoney is available. Click here for details. Or order online from one of these bookstores:
Amazon        Amazon