<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BRIC ETFs Have Many Access Points for Investors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.etftrends.com/2008/04/brics.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.etftrends.com/2008/04/brics.html</link>
	<description>Keeping a grip on exchange traded funds (ETFs)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:28:06 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Lydon</title>
		<link>http://www.etftrends.com/2008/04/brics.html/comment-page-1/#comment-879</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Lydon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 21:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etftrends.com.s14057.gridserver.com/2008/04/bric-etfs-have-many-access-points-for-investors.html#comment-879</guid>
		<description>Bill,

Shares of INP are still trading on the secondary market, but no new shares are being created. Talks are currently taking place, and it&#039;s hoped that at some point creation of new shares will take place when and if the restrictions are lifted.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill,</p>
<p>Shares of INP are still trading on the secondary market, but no new shares are being created. Talks are currently taking place, and it&#8217;s hoped that at some point creation of new shares will take place when and if the restrictions are lifted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Lydon</title>
		<link>http://www.etftrends.com/2008/04/brics.html/comment-page-1/#comment-878</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Lydon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 16:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etftrends.com.s14057.gridserver.com/2008/04/bric-etfs-have-many-access-points-for-investors.html#comment-878</guid>
		<description>Hi Bill,

We&#039;ll research this and get back to you.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bill,</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll research this and get back to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.etftrends.com/2008/04/brics.html/comment-page-1/#comment-877</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 02:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etftrends.com.s14057.gridserver.com/2008/04/bric-etfs-have-many-access-points-for-investors.html#comment-877</guid>
		<description>You said above with regard to INP that &quot;Indian securities regulators shut the door on all exchange traded products, effectively knocking out the fund.&quot; Also, in the link above under India, you explained how India can do this as follows: &quot;Easy: by limiting foreign investment in their publicly traded companies and putting caps on the numbers of shares that can be owned by foreigners, exchange traded products become illiquid and essentially useless.&quot;

My question is: if this is the case, then why were two new Inidan ETFs still launched after this anyway? Shouldn&#039;t they be affected just as adversely as INP? Also, what&#039;s realistically going to happen to INP? Do you think it&#039;s going to be closed any time soon?

- Bill



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You said above with regard to INP that &#8220;Indian securities regulators shut the door on all exchange traded products, effectively knocking out the fund.&#8221; Also, in the link above under India, you explained how India can do this as follows: &#8220;Easy: by limiting foreign investment in their publicly traded companies and putting caps on the numbers of shares that can be owned by foreigners, exchange traded products become illiquid and essentially useless.&#8221;</p>
<p>My question is: if this is the case, then why were two new Inidan ETFs still launched after this anyway? Shouldn&#8217;t they be affected just as adversely as INP? Also, what&#8217;s realistically going to happen to INP? Do you think it&#8217;s going to be closed any time soon?</p>
<p>- Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
