If It's Clinton Or Obama, These ETFs Might Benefit

February 16, 2008
by Tom Lydon

Clintonobama Now it's time for the flip-side: What exchange traded funds (ETFs) stand to gain from a Democrat (that will be either Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton at this point) occupying the White House?

If Obama wins, says Kevin Baker for The Street, his website calls for $150 billion over ten years to be invested in clean energy technologies. He wants advances in biofuels, plug-in hybrids and an increase in the research of solar and wind power.

Clinton also has marked clean energy as a priority. She wants to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 80% and cut foreign oil imports, and like Obama, she wants to increase the investment in energy research and development.

With priorities like those, a fund such as the PowerShares WilderHill Clean Energy Portfolio (PBW) could almost certainly benefit. One-third of the ETF is invested in alternative-energy stocks. Market Vectors Global Alternative Energy (GEX) might benefit in a Democratic administration, as well.

Another centerpiece of both the Clinton and Obama campaigns is health care reform. Obama wants to force price cuts in the industry, but without mandating that everyone be covered. Clinton, on the other hand, wants every man, woman and child insured.

The iShares Dow Jones US Insurance Index Fund (IAK) might do well in a Clinton White House, but fare poorly in an Obama one.

If Clinton is the nominee, the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR (XLY) could be worth a look. That's because her nomination could inspire Republicans to dig deep and donate big toward political commercials. Almost a third of the fund is invested in media companies.

Another fund worth a look if Obama wins the White House is the PowerShares Dynamic Building & Construction (PKB). His plan calls for more spending on roads, bridges and schools. Since this fund is 30% allocated in engineering and construction, it could reap the rewards.

« Sector Rotation In A Global ETF Portfolio | Main | What Stands Between Active ETFs and Their Launch? You. »

» FREE E-mail Newsletter

Enter your e-mail address to subscribe to our Daily Market Update.

We will not share your information with third parties.


Comments

I think it depends on more whether Congress renews the renewable energy tax credits which are scheduled to automatically expire at the end of 2008. If these tax credits are not renewed then no matter the intention of whoever occipies the White House there will be a significant disincentive for any meaningful continued investment (at least in the nearterm).

An added dimension is the growing combination of the instability by numerous oil (and natural gas) producing countries - Iran, Iraq, Venezuela and Nigeria with the fact that numerous nuclear and coal-burning electric generation facilities are located in drought stricken regions. Oil and natural gas are not as cheap nor as reliable as they once were. Water is the same. We all recognize that solar and wind power is both reliable and uses very little water - ideal for dependable electric generation. This would fit in nicely to the plug-in hybrids and hydrogen economies which many have proposed.

If Chavez would just stop shipping oil to the US then we would see the price of natural gas and oil go up substantially (the market reacts unfavorably to uncertainty). Alternative energy is a way to decouple economies from these outside influences and a way for local economies to develop new jobs and generate electricity with minimal water requirements.

Notice I said nothing about global warming.

Post a comment